[STDS-802-11-ARC] FW: [802.1 - 11058] Working Group recirculation ballot of P802.1Qbz/D2.2
--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 ARC Reflector ---
ARCers and AKers,
You may find this ballot of interest, and as usual, 802.11 comments are welcomed.
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: List HELP only [mailto:hdk.1-gqafncy@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stephen Haddock
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 11:18 AM
To: STDS-802-1-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [802.1 - 11058] Working Group recirculation ballot of P802.1Qbz/D2.2
Epoll response needed ASAP: forwarding P802.1CM PAR Ballot due July 31: P802.1CB/D1.1
Due Aug. 5: P802.1AB-REV/D0.3
For particulars see
www.ieee802.org/1/email-pages/ballots.html
Working Group 802.1 Web pages: www.ieee802.org/1/
802.1 list help: www.ieee802.org/1/email-pages/zmqw1113.html
-----
NOTE: ALL BALLOT RESPONSES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE NEW BALLOT RESPONSE LIST:
STDS-802-1-ballot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
PLEASE!
This Email is attached to an official 802.1 Working Group recirculation ballot form for P802.1Qbz/D2.2 - Virtual Bridged Local Area Networks -
Amendment: Enhancements to Bridging of 802.11 Media. As this is a Working Group ballot, only 802.1 voting members and liaisons are entitled to vote; however, any non-voting participants in the activities of 802.1 may submit a "Comment Only" ballot on the draft. In accordance with established practice in 802 and the IEEE, all comments received, whether from voters or non-voters, are given due consideration during the Ballot resolution process.
NOTE: As this is a formal WG ballot, if you vote "Approve" you are stating that, in your professional opinion, you consider the document to be technically complete, and ready for Sponsor ballot (i.e., the document is essentially ready for publication, apart from final editing for style, etc.). Hence, sending in an "approve" ballot response within a small number of minutes of the ballot start time cannot possibly mean that the voter has given the document the level of professional consideration necessary to make such a judgment. I believe the record so far was less than 10 minutes between posting the draft and ballot announcement, and receiving the first "Approve" - and that was on a document That contained Editor's notes indicating areas where work needed to be done!
As this is a recirculation ballot, some different rules apply:
- The balloting period is a minimum of 15 days.
- The subject matter of the ballot is NOT the entire document; the scope of this ballot is ONLY those changes to the draft that were made in order to resolve the ballot comments on the previous draft, any ballot resolutions that may have been incorrectly applied, and any ballot comments that may have been rejected.
- You need to return a ballot ONLY if you wish to change your previous vote on P802.1Qbz. If you do not return a ballot, your previous vote will apply unchanged.
- Responses are particularly solicited from those voters that made Disapprove votes on the previous ballot, in order to confirm whether or not the agreed ballot resolutions address their concerns. To put it more definitely, if you are an 802.1 voting member who has submitted a previous Disapprove, we will have to hound you until we receive a response.
The 802.1 voting members that are entitled to a vote on this ballot are as follows (NOTE: for a WG ballot, the voting population is fixed at the start of the ballot, and does not change during any subsequent recirculation ballots, regardless of any membership changes over the course of the balloting cycle):
Ao, Ting
Boiger, Christian
Bottorff, Paul
Chen, David
Chen, Feng
Cheng, Weiying
Crupnicoff, Diego
Cummings, Rodney
Diamond, Patrick
DIARRA, Aboubacar Kader
Farkas, Janos
Finn, Norman
Garner, Geoffrey
Ghanwani, Anoop
Gravel, Mark
Gray, Eric W
Gunther, Craig
Haddock, Stephen
Hayakawa, Hitoshi
Hitt, Jeremy
Hussain, Rahil
Jeffree, Anthony
Johas Teener, Michael
Jones, Peter
Keen, Hal
Kiessling, Marcel
Kim, Yongbum
Klein, Philippe
Korhonen, Jouni
Lynch, Jeff
Mack-Crane, Ben
Mangin, Christophe
McIntosh, James
Messenger, John
Multanen, Eric
Pannell, Donald
Parsons, Glenn
Randall, Karen
Riegel, Maximilian
Romascanu, Dan
Rouyer, Jessy V
Saltsidis, Panagiotis
Sarikaya, Behcet
Seaman, Michael
Sexton, Daniel
Specht, Johannes
Stanton, Kevin B
Steiner, Wilfried
Tabatabaee, Vahid
Thaler, Patricia
Touve, Jeremy
Weber, Karl
Wei, Yuehua
Weis, Brian
Woods, Jordon
Zuniga, Juan-Carlos
It should be noted that the ongoing retention of 802.1 voting rights is predicated on active participation in Working Group ballots. Active participation is defined to be returning ballot forms in two out of the last three Working Group ballots. The 802 Operating Rules allow abstention for any cause other than "lack of technical expertise" to be treated as though it were a failure to respond to a ballot. 802.1 applies this rule.
The closing date of this ballot is:
12th August 2015
The PDF file of P802.1Qbz/D2.2 can be found at:
http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/private/bz-drafts/d2/802-1Qbz-d2-2.pdf
The MIB text is an attachment to the draft PDF.
The comment disposition for the previous ballot is here:
http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/private/bz-drafts/d2/802-1Qbz-d2-1-dis.pdf
[MAH] 802.11 member credentials will work to access these documents
If you have any difficulty downloading or reading this file, let me know.
As is normal with such ballots, comments should specify not only what problems have been identified with the text, but also what the commenter proposes as a solution.
Any comments accompanying the ballot must be presented using either of the templates to be found here:
http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/private/commenting-tool/MyBallot-tools/
Comments can be generated using Excel or an equivalent spreadsheet program that will read XLS or CSV format files. Attach the resultant file, in XLS or CSV format, to your ballot response email.
RETURNING YOUR BALLOT FORM
==========================
Your ballot must be returned to:
STDS-802-1-ballot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
You are requested to use (exactly!) the appropriate Subject line from the following set when returning your ballot. Please send your ballot with the Subject line explicitly set, rather than using the Reply function in your mailer.
P802.1Qbz/D2.2 - Approve
P802.1Qbz/D2.2 - Comments (with approve)
P802.1Qbz/D2.2 - Disapprove
P802.1Qbz/D2.2 - Comments (with abstain)
P802.1Qbz/D2.2 - Abstain
Regards,
Norm Finn
Project Editor.
******************************
Ballot form follows.....
******************************
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: EMAIL ALL BALLOT RESPONSES ONLY TO:
STDS-802-1-ballot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
==========================
P802.1Qbz/D2.2 EMAIL BALLOT
==========================
TO: Norm Finn,
Editor, P802.1Qbz
SUBJECT: P802.1Qbz/D2.2 - Virtual Bridged Local Area Networks—Amendment:
Enhancements to Bridging of 802.11 Media
_____ I Approve (may attach non-binding comments below) _____ I Disapprove (must attach binding comments below) _____ I Abstain for the following reasons (may attach non-binding comments
below):
______ Lack of Time
______ Lack of Expertise
______ Other: _______________________________________________
____________________________________________
(Name)
____________________________________________
(Telephone No.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
INCLUDE COMMENTS ONLY AS AN ATTACHMENT, USING THE TEMPLATES IDENTIFIED ABOVE.
===
===
Unsubscribe link: mailto:STDS-802-1-L-SIGNOFF-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
IEEE. Fostering technological innovation and excellence for the benefit of humanity.