Re: [STDS-802-11-TGAX] Comment resolution status

Thread Links	Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Hello Robert,

Thanks for your great effort.

Meantime, I noticed some typos regarding 11-16-1202-05-00ax-cr-he-ltf.

1. In P255L17 and P255L24 in D0.5, shall be changed to

2. Between P256L27 and P256L29 in D0.5, it misses the description for the generation of time domain symbol of 1x HE-LTF and 2x HE-LTF from P194L30 to P195L21 in TGax D0.4

3. Between P257L18 and P257L19 in D0.5, it misses the description for other parameters for equation 26-59 (D0.5) from P196L15 to P196L41 in in TGax D0.4. (Note: the value of a_r is already determined in the last F2F, please refer to other documents )

Best wishes,

Ming Gan

From: *** 802.11 TGax - HEW - High Efficiency WLAN *** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGAX@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Yan(MSI) Zhang
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 9:10 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGAX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGAX] Comment resolution status

Hello Robert,

Thank you for your efforts making all the changes in D0.5.

I also noticed that some CRs are missed.

1. P210L41, represents the cyclic shift for the transmitter chain whose values are TBD. The proposed change is “whose values are defined in 26.3.10.2.12 (Cyclic shift for pre-HE modulated fields)”.

2. P211L6, For HE modulated fields, represents the cyclic shift per space-time stream, whose value is defined in Table 25-xx (Cyclic shift values for the HE modulated fields of a PPDU). The proposed change is “whose value is defined in 26.3.10.2.2 (Cyclic shift for HE modulated fields)”.

3. P213L19 (CR #2531), Nsts,total is not changed to Nsts in equation 26-9, P214L17, TGI,Legacypreamble is not changed to TGI,L-LTF in equation 26-11. P216L4, Nsts,total is not changed to Nsts in equation 26-14. Equation 26-18 is wrong, different than the one proposed in CR #2531. It is in document 802.11-16/ 1137r4.

4. In Table 26-12 (see document 802.11-16/1135r2).

a. P204L10 (CR #2522), remove at r-th RU, and NCBPS = NCBPS, 0,0 change to NCBPS = NCBPS, 0

b. P204L16, “For the Data field, NCBPSS,r,u equals the number of coded bits per symbol per spatial stream at r-th RU for user u “, change to “NCBPSS,u equals the number of coded bits per symbol per spatial stream for user u, u = 0, ..., Nuser_total –1.” For an HE SU PPDU, NCBPSS = NCBPSS,0.

c. P204L27 “Number of coded bits per subcarrier per spatial stream at r-th RU for user u, u = 0, ..., Nuser,total – 1.(#2522) For an HE SU PPDU, NBPSCS = NBPSCS,0,0.” Change to “Number of coded bits per subcarrier per spatial stream for user u, u = 0, ..., Nuser,total – 1.(#2522) For an HE SU PPDU, NBPSCS = NBPSCS,0. “

5. P208L7(CR#286), Equation 26-4, m is summed from 1 to Nsts,r,u instead of Nsts,r,u-1. (see document 802.11-16/1136r5).

6. P209L18(CR#286), Equation 26-6 beta,r definition is not corrected as shown in document 802.11-16/1136r5.

I really appreciate if you can correct those misses in the next version.

Thanks a lot

Yan

From: *** 802.11 TGax - HEW - High Efficiency WLAN *** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGAX@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sung Eun Lee
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 2:04 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGAX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGAX] Comment resolution status

Hello Robert,

First of all, thank you very much for making D0.5 available.

I guess it is a tremendous amount of effort to capture all motions at once.

It seems some of the proposed changes for passed motions in September are missed in D0.5 (mostly Editorial part), so I would appreciate if you could consider to capture the following comments for the next revision.

I also put the corresponding Motion and contribution number for each comment.

Comment for changes	Clause	Page	Line	Contribution	Motion Number
Change GI2 to GI, i.e., T_GI2,L-LTF -> T_GI,L-LTF	26.3.9	209	54	11-16/1179r4	PHY #172
Remove the number at the end T_GI,HE-LTF1, i.e., T_GI,HE-LTF1 -> T_GI,HE-LTF	26.3.9	210	10	11-16/1179r4	PHY #172
Remove the number at the end T_GI,HE-LTF2, i.e., T_GI,HE-LTF2 -> T_GI,HE-LTF	26.3.9	210	12	11-16/1179r4	PHY #172
Remove the number at the end T_GI,HE-LTF4, i.e., T_GI,HE-LTF4 -> T_GI,HE-LTF	26.3.9	210	14	11-16/1179r4	PHY #172
In Table 26-16, the number of bits for B21-B22 is 2 not 3	26.3.10.7.2	218	26	11-16/1179r4 11-16/1148r6	PHY #172 CR #83
Please update the text HE-SIG-A2 to "HE-SIG-A2 for HE_SU PPDU or HE-SIG-A3 for HE_EXT_SU PPDU"	26.3.10.7.2	221	25	11-16/1179r4	PHY #172
beta_r^Field description in D0.5 is different from 16/1136r5 (missing Trigger-based PPDU part). In addition, r index in the summation should be from 0 to N_RU-1	26.3.9	209	24	11-16/1136r5	CR #80
We introduce the new parameter T_GI,L-LTF in PHY #172 (1179r4), and it is reflected in CR #81 as well. Please change the parameter name T_GI,LegacyPreamble to T_GI,L-LTF as in 16/1137r4.	26.3.10.4	214	22	11-16/1137r4	CR #81
alpha_r exists in (26-115) which is different from 16/1138r4. Since no normalization factor for all other RUs is applied, numerator would be 1, so please replace alpha_r to 1 in Eq (26-115)	26.3.11.14	280	17	11-16/1138r4	CR #82

Thank you.

Sungeun

From: *** 802.11 TGax - HEW - High Efficiency WLAN *** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGAX@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stacey, Robert
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2016 2:06 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGAX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGAX] Comment resolution status

Thanks Bin,

I guess I missed that – I assumed only the titles were updated. I’ll add them and have them in the next revision – probably D1.0 coming out of November.

-Robert

From: Tian, Bin [mailto:btian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2016 10:57 AM
To: Stacey, Robert <robert.stacey@xxxxxxxxx>; STDS-802-11-TGAX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Comment resolution status

Hi Robert

Thank you for preparing D0.5.

The tables in 26.5 (MCS and parameters) are still not up-to-date. The contribution 11-16/736r0 which was passed motion in May have all the new tables. Can you add them to the next version of draft?

Thanks

Bin

From: *** 802.11 TGax - HEW - High Efficiency WLAN *** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGAX@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stacey, Robert
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 1:37 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGAX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGAX] Comment resolution status

Hello All,

The latest comment resolution spreadsheet is available here: https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/16/11-16-0535-08-00ax-comments-on-tgax-d0-1.xlsx

This includes all the resolutions adopted to date as well as the editing status through D0.5. The comment resolution status is summarized below and D0.5 will be available early next week.

Regards,

-Robert

Count of CID	Column Labels
Owning Ad-hoc	Unassigned	Assigned	Resolution Drafted	Approved	Duplicate	Grand Total
EDITOR	20	147	668	1575	160	2570
Edited in D0.3			2	400		402
Edited in D0.4				13		13
Edited in D0.5			3	670		673
Editorials		126	26		2	154
Editorials in D0.2			636	2	153	791
Need Proposal	8	21				29
No change to draft			1	321	4	326
Technical in D0.2				169	1	170
(blank)	12					12
MAC	8	189		1		198
A-MPDU		5				5
Annexes	5	4				9
Block Ack		35		1		36
Clause 6 & 8		15				15
Fragmentation		3				3
HE Capabilities/Operation		2				2
HT Control		22				22
MAC General	3	36				39
Receive operating mode		2				2
Sounding		6				6
Trigger frame format		45				45
TWT		13				13
TX/RXVECTOR		1				1
MU		86				86
MU operation		63				63
MU-RTS/CTS & NAV		23				23
SR		34	1			35
Spatial Reuse		34	1			35
PHY	1	28			1	30
Annexes		1				1
Coding		1				1
Editorials		1				1
HE-SIG-B		4				4
HE-STF & HE-LTF		2				2
MU-RTS/CTS & NAV		1				1
Need Proposal		1				1
OFDMA tone plan		1				1
PHY Intro		5				5
PHY Transmit spec		3			1	4
Pilot subcarriers		1				1
TX/RXVECTOR		3				3
(blank)	1	4				5
Grand Total	29	484	669	1576	161	2919

_______________________________________________________________________________