| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hi Junghoon, Thanks for your e-mail. Hopefully the PPDU format for joint sounding NDP can stay the same as the regular NDP so that we don’t need much multi-AP related additions in this section. However, we can discuss about the proper place for things
you mention as more decisions get made on this topic and multi-AP sounding. Regardless, I do think we are not yet ready to start drafting this section. Regards, Sameer From: Junghoon Suh <Junghoon.Suh@xxxxxxxxxx> CAUTION: This email
originated from outside of the organization. Hi, Sameer Thank you for taking an initiative on spec draft writing for this section. As I asked during the call today, I wanted to clarify the Multi AP Sounding NDP case, such as the LTF design for Joint sounding NDP transmitted from coordinated APs simultaneously, indication of
global number of LTFs or Streams across coordinated APs in NDP, etc. I am the PoC of Multi AP Sounding section, and I even wonder if I need to include the issues I mentioned above in the Multi AP Sounding section which I take as a PoC or in the EHT Sounding NDP which
you take as a PoC. Regards Junghoon From: Sameer Vermani [mailto:svverman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Hi ‘EHT Sounding NDP TTT members’ and all, EHT Sounding NDP section in PHY will mainly cover the NDP PPDU format details. As the POC for this section, I plan to draft the spec text and then have a discussion with TTT members. Considering lack of motions related to this section
so far, the spec drafting needs to wait for agreements to be made on this topic. Let me know if you have any comments or suggestions. Regards, Sameer To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 |