Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Discussion for CID 13216 of 4.3.16a (regarding 16xMU-MIMO)

["Yang, Zhijie (NSB - CN/Shanghai)" <zhijie.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi All,

 

If I remember correctly, the 16 SS is the candidate feature in 11be PAR, why the group plan to drop it, may I request the group provide more technical explanation before voting it?

 

Thanks

 

Best Regards

 

Jay Yang

 

From: Evgeny Khorov <khorov@xxxxxxx>
Sent: 2022年7月28日 0:23
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Discussion for CID 13216 of 4.3.16a (regarding 16xMU-MIMO)

 

Dear all,

 

Actually, my initial idea when submitting this comment was exactly to raise the discussion of whether we need this feature in 11be or not.

 

In my view, the current features of 11be towards a higher capacity focus mainly on extensive throughput growth, i.e., they increase the bandwidth with 320 MHz channels or multilink operation. 

 

In contrast, Higher order of MIMO means intensive growth: 16xMIMO increases spectrum efficiency, though it may raise some issues related to sounding optimization.

 

Best regards,

Evgeny Khorov

 

 

 

On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 7:01 PM Yanyi Ding <yanyi.ding@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi all,

 

Thanks for comments and discussion during the meeting, this is a thread for offline discussion about CID 13216.

The original comment is as below:

13216

Evgeny Khorov

55.36

4.3.16a

16x MU-MIMO is missing but was discussed as a candidate feature

Add the support of 16x MU-MIMO

I guess we need to have a SP to decide whether to keep 16xMU-MIMO in 11be or next GEN?

 

Best regards,

Yanyi

---

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1

---

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1