Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGM] Proposed resolutions for CIDs on 802.1D withdrawal



--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector ---

Mike,

 

I started looking at CID 55, which looks like you’re changing the UP values to the 802.1Q (PCP) ones.  That’s doesn’t match what you said below in #3.  Am I confused?

 

Then, I got to CID 78.  So, what I think you’re saying is that you created the concept of 802.11 UPs, but you aligned them with 802.1Q PCPs.  So, they no longer match the 802.1D priorities.  This is a technical change (as evidenced by the need to change figures in Annex R, for example), and I think is a HUGE mistake.  It will invalidate all the existing implementations.  I thought we agreed not to do this…

 

So, now I’m really confused.

 

Mark

 

From: Mark Rison <m.rison@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, June 2, 2021 12:19 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGM] Proposed resolutions for CIDs on 802.1D withdrawal

 

--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector ---

I have a question regarding the term "802.11 UP", which appears in

55, 58, 61, 78, 79.

 

From what I'm understanding, the only thing that has a UP now is

802.11.  802.1D is dead and 802.1Q has PCPs not UPs.  So I don't think

"UP" (or "user priority") needs to be adorned with "802.11".

 

In turn, I am confused by the "802.1Q UP"s (or "802.1Q default priorities")

in 59, 60, 66, 78.  Aren't these all 802.1Q PCPs?

 

Thanks,

 

Mark

 

--

Mark RISON, Standards Architect, WLAN   English/Esperanto/Français

Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre       Tel: +44 1223  434600

Innovation Park, Cambridge CB4 0DS      Fax: +44 1223  434601

ROYAUME UNI                             WWW: http://www.samsung.com/uk

 

From: M Montemurro <montemurro.michael@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, 2 June 2021 18:55
To: STDS-802-11-TGM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGM] Proposed resolutions for CIDs on 802.1D withdrawal

 

--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector ---

Hi all,

 

I posted https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/21/11-21-0695-02-000m-revme-cc35-802-1d-comments.xlsx, which proposes resolutions to comments submitted with respect to updating REVme to address the withdrawal of 802.1D.

 

Based on the feedback after presenting this document twice and a careful review of the comments, I proposed resolutions to all the comments:

 

1) The group has discussed the comments in GREEN are marked them Ready for Motion on the REVme call on April 26. 

2) I reviewed the comments in WHITE and believe they are simple resolutions that we can accept.

3) For the comments in YELLOW, I believe additional discussion is needed. I prepared resolutions under my proposed assumption that in the base 802.11 standard, we would want to maintain the default User Priority mapping that was originally defined in 802.1D. I renamed these 802.11 user priority values. 

 

Before I schedule this document for presentation again, I'd like to solicit feedback on the reflector on these CIDs (namely the CIDs marked in YELLOW and WHITE).

 

Cheers,

 

Mike


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM&A=1

Image removed by sender.


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM&A=1


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM&A=1