| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
I would like to thank Phil, Changhoi and
Prakash for taking on this task on their own initiative. It was not an easy
thing to do. I want to reiterate Phil’s point
that people should look closely at these contributions and, as much as possible,
work together over the next week to harmonize and simplify. It would be
great if we received a lot of reply comments that withdrew original
contributions in favor of a single harmonized contribution. Also, as Phil notes, over half the
contributions are on the PHY. In my own somewhat cursory examination of
these contributions, a number of them strike me as either enhancements or fixes
to the RevD document having little or no relation to mobility. Task Group
e is not chartered to add non-mobile enhancements to the RevD document, and
these types of changes will be summarily ruled out-of-scope. Regarding fixes to the RevD document, in a 23 June e-mail, Roger indicated his intent to open a Corrigendum PAR to cover this type of material and provided a means for people to provide those types of comments by uploading them: “Please submit your report, in Commentary format, to: http://maint.wirelessman.org.” If you have a comment or contribution of
that type, please withdraw it from TGe, and resubmit it to the above directory. Given everyone’s cooperation, and a
little luck, we may actually make it all the way through. Brian From: Phillip Barber
[mailto:pbarber@BROADBANDMOBILETECH.COM] Thanks to the assistance of some able and willing recruits
(Thanks Changhoi and Prakash), we have completed the Session #33 contributions
organization and overview document. I have uploaded the document to
the Temp upload directory (http://temp.wirelessman.org). This is an informal effort to provide some context to view
and evaluate the various contributions. Hopefully, authors and members
alike will see other contributions, of a similar topical nature, and take the
initiative to harmonize. At the very least, members will be able to see
alternate proposals, which might otherwise be difficult to detect given the
volume of contributions. Topical groupings are purely arbitrary; topical
assignment by the editor, based on limited evaluation. I am certain that
other groupings might well suffice. I am equally certain that some
contributions may be mis-filed, or apply to more than one grouping (though for
this document, each contribution occurs only once). Overview/summary
information is just cursory--please do not be too critical. I would especially like to draw your attention to the large
volume of OFDMA PHY contributions. I would hope that the OFDMA PHY community
could harmonize and reduce the volume of competing contributions in the space
(and there are many, many competing contributions on the same subject matter
within OFDMA, even between authors from the same company). Fast_Feedback,
Preambles, and MIMO are all areas that some harmonization should be expected. Please provide comments and criticisms to improve the
document. I hope that this document proves useful to some portion of
the membership. Thanks, Note: Ignore color use in the document. Colors used
only to distinguish editor identity. |