| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
The Rate Ad Hoc (hence known as RAH) met and agreed to discuss
concerns and then plan how to continue. The following people expressed the
following concerns.
Necdet Uzun: No packet loss on ring; not preclude STB; not complicate MAC design; high priority should be shaped to CBR; jitter can be worsened by control packets; ring not owned/operated by one entity, can trust all MACs, but not all clients John Lemon: STB (or small second buffer of DTB) doesn't compromise DTB on same ring, such as effecting jitter sensitive traffic; reservation per link, different allowed; reserved traffic jitter bounded by N MTU; topology negotiated secondary buffer size determining ramp up of low pri traffic; loss < jitter < utilization; not constrained by 802 bridging, just support superset of 802 bridging – dumb client sends all BE traffic Harry Peng: STB design is not precluded; must interop, but maybe at slightly reduced performance; separation of access jitter and transit jitter; constrained by 802 bridging compliance, make sure we don't break it Luis Rovira: concerned about complexity; wants simulation/calculation proof/certainty Stein Gjessing: how do we specify what values are advertised and how do we specify node's behavior to comply Italo Busi: negotiate for priorities for loss, jitter, utilization Yiming Yao: allow customer to choose between loss, jitter, and utilization Anoop: should not preclude VDQ; should allow algorithm other than ramp up/down Other attendees: Tricia Hill, Vitorio Mascolo, Yongdong Zhao, Rhett Brikovskis, Li Mo, Peter Jones. Going forward:
|