RE: contributions for upcoming May 2004 meeting - ARID
Hi Daniel,
I just addressed my comment in last mail on your question referring
Stephen's comment.
I would like to ask what you exactly mean by 'agreement' from other WGs. I
am wondering if it is possible to change 802.11 or 16 message within 802.21
even if we got a sort of agreement from other WG.
The upper layer solution and element (e.g. ARID format) could be discussed
within 802.21 and release 'recommendation' document, but the way to adapt
that solution and specific message changes could not discussed within
802.21. In ARID case, you can contribute ARID in L2 message concept to
802.21 and the operational scenarios and element format can be discussed
within 802.21 as the generic model to standardize, and 802.11 case can be
addressed as the example scenario in 802.21.
However, if you want to contribute ARID in specific 802.11 Beacon message,
you should contribute it to 802.11 WIEN SG.
now clear ? :)
Best Regards,
Sungjin Lee
=====================================
Global Standards & Research Team
Telecommunication R&D Center
Samsung Electronics
TEL : +82 31 279 5248
FAX : +82 31 279 5130
MOBILE : +82 16 301 6603
E-mail : steve.lee@samsung.com
======================================
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-21@listserv.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-stds-802-21@listserv.ieee.org] On Behalf Of S. Daniel Park
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 10:13 AM
To: steve.lee@SAMSUNG.COM; 'McCann, Stephen'; 'stds-802-21'
Cc: ajayrajkumar@LUCENT.COM; 'Pyungsoo Kim'
Subject: RE: contributions for upcoming May 2004 meeting - ARID
Steve, please see my inline comments.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sungjin Lee [mailto:steve.lee@samsung.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 9:48 AM
> To: 'S. Daniel Park'; 'McCann, Stephen'; 'stds-802-21'
> Cc: ajayrajkumar@LUCENT.COM; 'Pyungsoo Kim'
> Subject: RE: contributions for upcoming May 2004 meeting - ARID
>
>
> Hi Daniel, Stephen and all HO guys
>
> In my understanding, that kind of issue (e.g. ARID into
> beacon) is fit to be discussed within 802.21. The ARID formant,
> recommended usage examples and scenarios also could be discussed and
> then put into the documentation released as 802.21 spec. based on
> agreement between 802.21 attendees.
>
> However, the specific way to provide that ARID information over the
> air interface should be discussed within each WG. In fact, It sould be
> discussed within 802.11 WG to propose the changed Beacon frame
> structure including ARID and within
> 802.16 to propose the changed DL-MAP or NBR-ADV message including
> ARID.
It was my original question, so I guess this work is useful for related WG
such as 802.11, 802.16 but the contribution should be discussed in the
80.21, of course we have to get the agreement of 802.11 to insert ARID into
the beacon.
Of course we have to get the agreement of 802.16 if ARID would be applied
for 802.16.
correct ? or am I missing anything ?
I am not sure how I can get the agreement of 802.11 to insert ARID into the
beacon. Do I have to propose it to the
802.11 as a document ? or 802.21 can be responsible for this collaboration.
I am so curious...
Regards.
- Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park)
- Mobile Platform Laboratory, SAMSUNG Electronics.