Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

RE: Comments 374 & 375

Title: Message
Apologies.. That was supposed to go to the 802.16 reflector.
 
DJ
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Johnston, Dj
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 1:51 PM
To: STDS-802-21@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Comments 374 & 375

Can anyone enlighten me as to what the objections to comment 374 and 375 are?
 
Looking at table 4, the size of the type fields for HT==0 and HT!=0 are clearly swapped and should be the other way around. As currently written, the text of table 4 is out of step with figures 19 and 20 and the headers end up without byte alignment or enough bits to accommodate the encoding in table 6 in packet types in generic MPDUs.
 
So I'm perplexed as to what the objection is.
 
DJ