Re: [802.21] Requirements Document v8
Hi Stephen,
I am sure that you are not suggesting that working on something quickly is a not
a good thing! Just because we are a standards group should not make it a
multi-year activity for each document.
Based on the input so far, I am hoping that we can work out the remaining
details towards the requirements in short order, without imposing deadlines.
best regards,
-ajay
On 8/10/2004 3:46 AM, McCann, Stephen wrote:
> Dear all,
> Thanks to you all for an interesting audio conference yesterday.
>
> However, I have a couple of points to make :
>
> 1) What are the current milestones/deadlines for this activity. I am
> a little lost
> as to what the goal of this activity is and I get the feeling
> that there is a rush
> to complete this document as quickly as possible, but I'm not
> sure why.
>
> 2) I agree with Yogesh that the scope of IEEE 802.21 appears to be
> too broad and
> perhaps a plan for a phased approach should be considered. For
> example, the
> separate thread about QoS could become a serious distraction and I
> think this
> should be left to one side for now.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Stephen
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gupta, Vivek G [mailto:vivek.g.gupta@intel.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 9:20 PM
> To: Bhatt Yogesh-E42614; STDS-802-21@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> Subject: RE: On putting section 4 Architecture in Requirements Document
>
>
>
> Yogesh,
>
>
>
> Do you really mean "Section 4" below and not some other section in
> the current doc?
>
> Section 4 seems to be one of the key sections of the current
> Requirements document as it defines the work items under
> consideration and their requirements.
>
>
>
> The scope of 802.21 is too broad and there are several elements of
> handover process the standard can attempt to optimize.
>
> This section attempts to lay some structure to that and then build
> specific requirements around it.
>
> Also 802.21 can include several work-items, so this section may well
> evolve over time.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> -Vivek
>