Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

RE: [Fwd: [802SEC] FW: [New-work] WG Review: Kitten (kitten)]



Hi ajay,
Does the creation of this group really impact our work in 21? I can not figure out how...
Best Regards
Eric

-----Message d'origine-----
De : owner-stds-802-21@listserv.ieee.org [mailto:owner-stds-802-21@listserv.ieee.org] De la part de Ajay Rajkumar
Envoyé : vendredi 22 octobre 2004 15:28
À : STDS-802-21@listserv.ieee.org
Objet : [Fwd: [802SEC] FW: [New-work] WG Review: Kitten (kitten)]

Folks,

FYI. This is new work being proposed in the IETF.

-ajay
Chair, IEEE 802.21 WG

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

A new IETF working group has been proposed in the Security Area.  The IESG has not made any determination as yet. The following description was submitted, and is provided for informational purposes only. Please send your comments to the IESG mailing list (iesg@ietf.org) by October 27th.

Kitten (kitten)
================

Current Status: Proposed Working Group

Description:

The Generic Security Services API [RFC 2743, RFC 2744] provides an API for applications to set up security contexts and to use these contexts for per-message protection services. The Common Authentication Technology Next Generation Working Group (Kitten) will work on standardizing extensions and improvements to the core GSSAPI specification and language bindings that the IETF believes are necessary based on experience using GSSAPI over the last 10 years. Extensions may be published as separate drafts or included in a GSSAPI version 3. While version 2 of the GSSAPI may be clarified, no backward incompatible changes will be made to this version of the API.

This working group is chartered to revise the GSSAPI v2 RFCs for the purpose of clarifying areas of ambiguity:
o Use of channel bindings
o Thread safety restrictions
o C language utilization clarifications and recommendations (e.g., type utilization, name spaces) o Guidelines for GSS-API mechanism designers o Guidelines for GSS-API application protocol designers

This working group is chartered to specify a non-backward compatible GSSAPI v3 including support for the following extensions:
o Clarify the portable use of channel bindings and better specify channel bindings in a language-independent manner.
o Specify thread safety extensions to allow multi-threaded applications to use GSSAPI o Definitions of channel bindings for TLS, IPSec, SSH and other cryptographic channels based on work started in the NFSV4 working group.
o Define a GSSAPI extension to allow applications to store credentials.
Discussions to be started based upon:
o draft-williams-gss-store-deleg-creds-xx.txt
o Extensions to solve problems posed by the Global Grid Forum's GSSAPI extensions document.
o Extensions to deal with mechanism-specific extensibility in a multi-mechanism environment.
o Extend the GSS-API to support authorization by portable GSS applications while also supporting mechanisms that do not have a single canonical name for each authentication identity.
o Specify a Domain-based GSS service principal name consisting of:
service name, host name, and domain name for use by application services hosted across multiple servers.
o Extensions to support stackable GSSAPI mechanisms.
o Define a Psuedo-Random Function for GSSAPI

This working group is chartered to perform the following GSSAPI mechanism specification work:

o Specify a GSSAPI v2/v3 Channel Conjunction Mechanism o Revise RFC 2748
(SPNEGO) to correct problems that make the specification unimplementable and to document the problems found in widely-deployed attempts to implement this spec.
o Update the GSSAPI Java Language Bindings to match actual implementation

This working group is chartered to perform the following new GSSAPI Language Binding specification work:

o Specify a language binding for C#

End of Proposed Charter

The participants of the IETF-CAT mailing list realize the quantity of work which we desire to undertake is quite ambitious in scope. This is simply an indication of how much work has accumulated over the last few years since the CAT working group disbanded. We believe that we can accomplish the stated work items in 18 months.