Re: [802.21] FW: DNA Group Activities
Greg,
Indeed, both offline and during meetings, 802.21 WG members have shown an
interest in formal interaction with DNA and other IETF working groups that would
benefit from the specifications being written/developed within IEEE 802.21.
We can discuss this further and come up with a mode of communication that would
be most optimal for both the groups, including a formal liaison.
Regards,
Ajay Rajkumar
Chair, IEEE 802.21 WG
On 2/11/2005 4:08 PM, Greg Daley wrote:
> Hi Vivek,
>
> I'm not worried about that.
>
> If there wasn't such a deathly quiet
> on the DNA list though I wouldn't have
> had to respond though.
>
> I just wanted people in 802.21 to know that
> at least I wasn't dead, and that interaction
> between the groups is valuable if there's
> interest from 802.21.
>
> "rumours of my death have been slightly exaggerated"
> and all that.
>
> Greg ;)
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gupta, Vivek G" <vivek.g.gupta@intel.com>
> Date: Saturday, February 12, 2005 7:37 am
> Subject: RE: FW: DNA Group Activities
>
>
>>Greg and others,
>>
>>By no means was I trying to imply that DNA is dead or anything of that
>>sort. In fact many of us in 802.21 follow it quite regularly.
>>
>>We are quite excited about the triggers and event services work in
>>802.21. And from what I know this was one of the primary work items
>>forwhich 802.21 was created in first place. I just wanted to remind
>>802.21folks of that.
>>
>>At the same time maybe some of the triggers/events (transport for
>>remotetriggers, etc.) discussion happening in 802.21 is
>>relevant/interestingto DNA as well and vice versa. So folks could
>>send their postings to
>>both reflectors if need be.
>>
>>Best Regards
>>-Vivek
>>
>>|-----Original Message-----
>>|From: Greg Daley [mailto:Greg.Daley@eng.monash.edu.au]
>>|Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 12:02 PM
>>|To: Gupta, Vivek G
>>|Cc: STDS-802-21@listserv.ieee.org
>>|Subject: Re: FW: DNA Group Activities
>>|
>>|Hi Vivek and 802.21,
>>|
>>|Things have indeed been quiet on the DNA list.
>>|
>>|It's not dead though, just playing possum.
>>|
>>|The DNA design team list has been working at about
>>|15 e-mails/day on evaluating solutions in the last
>>|month or so, and was doing about the same before
>>|christmas.
>>|
>>|
>>|Unfortunately, the mailing list doesn't seem
>>|to have the same level of activity.
>>|This is slightly troubling (but the Chairs
>>|have already talked to the Area Directors about
>>|it).
>>|
>>|If you'd like to comment on the original e-mail.
>>|
>>|Please feel free to do so, either here or
>>|in the other list.
>>|
>>|Greg Daley
>>|DNA WG Co-Chair
>>
>