Re: [802.21] IS Higher Layer Transport Requirements: update on conf call on December 8
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 04:07:33AM -0800, Gupta, Vivek G wrote:
>
> > - Do you mean with Length = variable, that the size of this field can
> be
> > extended depending on the information sent (like in .16)?
> [Vivek G Gupta]
> Yes
I think that Kalyan's question is as to whether the length of the
Length field is variable. The length of the Length field should be
constant. So the answer should be *No*.
>
> > I find, having a Length field of 2 Bytes is, in most cases, more
> than
> > enough.
> > i.e., 1 Byte can server the purpose in most of the cases.
> >
> [Vivek G Gupta]
> 1 byte is definitely inadequate. We can go with 2.
Yes, we can go with 2.
Yoshihiro Ohba
>
> >
> > With best regards,
> > Kalyan
> >
>