RE: Some strong comment from 802.16g
Comment 23: Technical, Non binding
MOB_MSMIH_MSG" is ambiguous. It's defined with no TLVs. It's better to
remove related text since they cannot be used currently. If it becomes
clear later, we can recreate it.
: This one is non-binding and we can provide TLV details to address
the concerns.
Comment 26: Technical, Binding
The document contains section 6.3.25 MIH Handover Function that in my
view falls out of the scope of spec....
....This is more of a spec scope type issue and 802.16 folks would
address it appropriately.
Not sure if these are really strong comments but glad that Peretz shall
be attending 802.16g meeting as a key MIH supporter. There shall likely
be other MIH supporters too. Either way we need to address these and any
other MIH related comments/concerns. If we don't get to this in May,
then we shall definitely address these in joint session during July
plenary.
Best Regards
-Vivek
> -----Original Message-----
> From: stds-802-21@ieee.org [mailto:stds-802-21@ieee.org] On Behalf Of
> Peretz Feder
> Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 11:22 PM
> To: STDS-802-21@listserv.ieee.org
> Subject: Some strong comment from 802.16g
>
> Ronny:
>
> The attached contains 802.16g comments for release 80216g_D2.
>
> Note comments 23 and 26 regarding MIH.
>
> A Call for Reply Comments has a deadline of Monday 8 May at 8 pm Tel
> Aviv time.
>
> Do we want to address/reply to it before the deadline? I'll be in
> Tel-Aviv to defend it and protect our 802.21 interest.
>
> Peretz