RE: [802.21] 3GPP TSG SA liaison statement to 802.16
WiMAX Forum also received this LS and is drafting up a response
coordinated across a few WGs.
-Prakash
-----Original Message-----
From: Feder, Peretz (Peretz) [mailto:pfeder@ALCATEL-LUCENT.COM]
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 1:40 PM
To: STDS-802-21@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [802.21] 3GPP TSG SA liaison statement to 802.16
Vivek:
I will provide you tomorrow changes to your proposed 802.16 response.
Prakash: I see this LS more pertinent to the NWG 3GPP IWK recently
published Annex than the 802.16-2007 or even 802.16m.
Peretz Feder
-----Original Message-----
From: Gupta, Vivek G [mailto:vivek.g.gupta@INTEL.COM]
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 11:03 AM
To: STDS-802-21@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [802.21] 3GPP TSG SA liaison statement to 802.16
Dear Roger,
Thanks for notifying us of this liaison from 3GPP.
For 802.21 members I have placed the LS on 802.21 web site at:
http://www.ieee802.org/21/doctree/2007-05_meeting_docs/L80216-07_022.pdf
Also I have created an initial response for this LS which we plan to
submit to 802.16 for consideration in their May meeting:
http://www.ieee802.org/21/doctree/2007-05_meeting_docs/C80216-07_0xxx.do
c
We shall also plan on discussing this further within 802.21 as well.
Kind Regards
-Vivek
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roger B. Marks [mailto:r.b.marks@ieee.org]
> Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 4:38 PM
> To: Gupta, Vivek G
> Cc: dot16; Williams Michael G.
> Subject: 3GPP TSG SA liaison statement to 802.16
>
> Dear Vivek,
>
> The IEEE 802.16 Working Group has received a liaison statement from
> 3GPP TSG SA entitled "Mobility interworking between 3GPP and WiMAX
> systems":
> <http://ieee802.org/16/liaison/docs/L80216-07_022.pdf>.
>
> Much of the statement appears applicable more to 802.21 than to
> 802.16. Therefore, perhaps you would bring it to the attention of the
> 802.21 WG.
>
> I would prefer for 802.16 to generate a response at its upcoming
> meeting, from 7-10 May <http://ieee802.org/16/meetings/mtg49>. I know
> that 802.21 meets the following week.
>
> My suggestion is for 802.16 to prepare and submit a response that may
> address some points in the statement but refers to 802.21 as the
> primary contact point for interworking. This would provide an
> opportunity for 802.21 to prepare a separate response when it meets.
>
> Should you have suggestions regarding 802.16's response, feel free to
> submit them as a contribution to the 802.16 WG.
>
> Regards,
>
> Roger