| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Yoshi,
The following is my vote.
BR,
James Han
-----Original Message-----
From: Yoshihiro Ohba [mailto:yohba@TARI.TOSHIBA.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 9:37 AM
To: STDS-802-21@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [802.21] Security SG: Scope issues
In November meeting, we had a straw poll related to scope issues on SSOH (Security Signaling Optimization during Handover) problem. The result was:
Support EAP: Yes(20)/No(0)
Support Non-EAP: Yes(10)/ No(7)
Support inter-technology handover: Yes(21)/No(0)
We need more detailed discussion to make a decision. Please state your opinion (as detailed as possible) on the scope-related issues listed below by next Security SG teleconference on December 18, 2007.
If those issues are resolved, we will be in a good position to come to an agreement on PAR/5C in January!
Issue 1: Should we support non-EAP in addition to EAP? Yes
Issue 2: Should we support handover to/from non-802 networks in addition to handover within 802 networks? Yes
Issue 3: Should we support inter-administrative-domain handover? Yes
The definition of "administrative domain" is given below:
"
Administrative Domain
A collection of End Systems, Intermediate Systems, and
subnetworks operated by a single organization or administrative
authority. The components which make up the domain are assumed
to interoperate with a significant degree of mutual trust among
themselves, but interoperate with other Administrative Domains
in a mutually suspicious manner.
Administrative Domains can be organized into a loose hierarchy
that reflects the availability and authoritativeness of
authentication and authorization information. This hierarchy does
not imply administrative containment, nor does it imply a strict
tree topology.
"
Best Regards,
Yoshihiro Ohba