Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

RE: [802.21] FW: 802.21 SB Recirculation



This is referring to figure-3 (comment 38 from last ballot)

Kind Regards
-Vivek

-----Original Message-----
From: Feder, Peretz (Peretz) [mailto:pfeder@alcatel-lucent.com] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 10:38 PM
To: Gupta, Vivek G; STDS-802-21@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [802.21] FW: 802.21 SB Recirculation

Vivek et al: Which Figure is this comment referring to? 

-----Original Message-----
From: Gupta, Vivek G [mailto:vivek.g.gupta@INTEL.COM] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 12:15 PM
To: STDS-802-21@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [802.21] FW: 802.21 SB Recirculation

Below is some guidance from Marc Emmelmann (one of the Disapprove voter
on 802.21 SB). I would like to thank Marc for providing us this
feedback.

Best Regards
-Vivek

-----Original Message-----
From: Marc Emmelmann [mailto:emmelmann@ieee.org] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 6:04 AM
To: Gupta, Vivek G
Subject: Re: 802.21 SB Recirculation

Dear Vivek,

sorry for coming back to you in the recirc. I missed the deadline.

I can accept all of your proposed resolutions regarding my comments  
except the one for CID 38:

I can accept that the figure is only meant to be an illustrative  
example. Nevertheless, I strongly feel, that the reader should be  
clearly aware that, e.g., the MIH concept does also apply if operator  
cores are connected via the "Internet".

If the group feels that this is too complicated to include in the  
figure itself, a corresponding note should be included.

If this issue is considered, I would have no problem changing my vote  
from No to Yes.

Thanks again for the reminder.

Best,
Marc


On 10.01.2008, at 05:52, Gupta, Vivek G wrote:

> Dear Marc,
>
> 802.21 WG has resolved your comments as part of initial ballot.
> We have not received any comments from you as part of the SB re- 
> circulation.
> We were wandering if you had a chance to look at the comment  
> resolutions and the updated draft.
>
> If you could give us some guidance about your position on the draft  
> w.r.t your comments that would help the group make appropriate  
> progress.
>
> Kind Regards
> -Vivek