Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Fwd: [802SEC] Fwd: Working group ballot of P802-REV/D1.2



Members,
Pl. let me and Vice Chair know if you have any comments.
Will appreciate if you send the comments a few days before the
deadline.

regards.
-Subir

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [802SEC] Fwd: Working group ballot of P802-REV/D1.2
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 17:01:29 +0000
From: Tony Jeffree <tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: 802-exec <STDS-802-SEC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


Colleauges -

As discussed in Dallas, please find the Working Group ballot announcement
for the P802 Overview and Architecture revision attached. As this is an
802.1 project, it is being balloted under 802.1 balloting procedures.

Under current rules, all EC members are ex-officio members of all working
groups, and are thus entitled to vote on WG ballots. If you wish to vote on
this ballot, please note the requirements stated below with regard to the
email address to use when returning your ballot, and the Excel template to
use if you wish to make comments. If you are returning a ballot on behalf of
a WG or TAG, please collate your group's comments and provide a single
ballot response in order to make James Gilb's life easier when processing
the ballot results.

WG/TAG Chairs, please forward this information to your groups.

Regards,
Tony


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Tony Jeffree <tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 18 November 2010 11:41
Subject: Working group ballot of P802-REV/D1.2
To: 802-1 <STDS-802-1-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


NOTE: ALL BALLOT RESPONSES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE NEW BALLOT RESPONSE LIST:

    STDS-802-1-ballot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

PLEASE!

This Email is attached to an official 802.1 Working Group ballot form for
P802/D1.2 - Overview and Architecture. As this is a full Working Group
ballot, only 802.1 voting members and liaisons are entitled to vote;
however, any non-voting participants in the activities of 802.1 may submit a
"Comment Only" ballot on the draft. In accordance with established practice
in 802 and the IEEE, all comments received, whether from voters or
non-voters, are given due consideration during the Ballot resolution
process.

NOTE: As this is a formal WG ballot, if you vote "Approve" you are stating
that, in your professional opinion, you consider the document to be
technically complete, and ready for Sponsor ballot (i.e., the document is
essentially ready for publication, apart from final editing for style,
etc.). Hence, sending in an "approve" ballot response within a small number
of minutes of the ballot start time cannot possibly mean that the voter has
given the document the level of professional consideration necessary to make
such a judgment. I believe the record so far was less than 10 minutes
between posting the draft and ballot announcement, and receiving the first
"Approve" - and that was on a document that contained Editor's notes
indicating areas where work needed to be done!

The 802.1 voting members that are entitled to a vote on this ballot are as
follows (NOTE: for a WG ballot, the voting population is fixed at the start
of the ballot, and does not change during any subsequent recirculation
ballots, regardless of any membership changes over the course of the
balloting cycle):

Alon, Zehavit
Ao, Ting
Bao, Wanqun
Bottorff, Paul
Brandner, Rudolf
Carlson, Craig
Congdon, Paul
Crupnicoff, Diego
Desanti, Claudio
Ding, Zhemin
Eastlake, 3rd, Donald
Farkas, Janos
Fedyk, Donald
Finn, Norman
Ganga, Ilango
Garner, Geoffrey
Ghanwani, Anoop
Gray, Eric
Gunther, Craig
Haddock, Stephen
Jeffree, Anthony
Kamath, Daya
Keen, Hal
Kim, Yongbum
Klein, Philippe
Krause, Michael
Kumar, Vinod
li, lin
Mack-Crane, Ben
Menuchehry, Menu
Messenger, John
Morris, John
Multanen, Eric
Olsen, David
Pannell, Donald
Parsons, Glenn
Pelissier, Joseph
Randall, Karen
Rohde, Derek
Romascanu, Dan
Rouyer, Jessy
Saltsidis, Panagiotis
Seaman, Michael
Sharma, Rakesh
Shimizu, Takeshi
Sprecher, Nurit
Stanton, Kevin
Sultan, Robert
Teener, Michael
Thaler, Patricia
Wu, Chien-Hsien

It should be noted that the ongoing retention of 802.1 voting rights is
predicated on active participation in Working Group ballots.  Active
participation is defined to be returning ballot forms in two out of the last
three Working Group ballots. The 802 Operating Rules allow abstention for
any cause other than "lack of technical expertise" to be treated as though
it were a failure to respond to a ballot. 802.1 applies this rule.

The closing date of this ballot is:

         18th December 2010

The PDF file of P802/D1.2 can be found at:

http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/private/802-REV-drafts/d1/802-rev-D1-2.pdf

Username: p8021
Password: go_wildcats

If you have any difficulty downloading or reading this file, let me know.

As is normal with such ballots, comments should specify not only what
problems have been identified with the text, but also what the commenter
proposes as a solution.

Any comments accompanying the ballot must be presented using either of the
templates to be found here:

http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/private/commenting-tool/MyBallot-tools/

Comments can be generated using Excel or an equivalent spreadsheet program
that will read XLS or CSV format files. Attach the resultant file, in XLS or
CSV format, to your ballot response email.



RETURNING YOUR BALLOT FORM
==========================
Your ballot must be returned to:
STDS-802-1-ballot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

You are requested to use (exactly!) the appropriate Subject line from the
following set when returning your ballot. Please send your ballot with the
Subject line explicitly set, rather than using the Reply function in your
mailer.

P802/D1.2 - Approve
P802/D1.2 - Comments (with approve)
P802/D1.2 - Disapprove
P802/D1.2 - Comments (with abstain)
P802/D1.2 - Abstain


Regards,
Tony Jeffree
802.1 Chair.

******************************
Ballot form follows.....
******************************
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: EMAIL ALL BALLOT RESPONSES ONLY TO:
STDS-802-1-ballot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
==========================
P802/D1.2 EMAIL BALLOT
==========================
TO: James Gilb,
Editor, P802
SUBJECT:     P802/D1.2 - Overview and Architecture

_____ I Approve (may attach non-binding comments below)
_____ I Disapprove (must attach binding comments below)
_____ I Abstain for the following reasons (may attach non-binding comments
below):
______ Lack of Time
______ Lack of Expertise
______ Other: _______________________________________________

____________________________________________
(Name)
____________________________________________
(Telephone No.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------

INCLUDE COMMENTS ONLY AS AN ATTACHMENT, USING THE TEMPLATES IDENTIFIED
ABOVE.

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.