Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

RE: LB 4b comment resolution



Comment 27. Line 32; Relating to MIIS.

You are correct that the MN while on a DO network cannot query the MIIS.

However if the MN is not on a DO network, and wants to query the MIIS about other available networks (e.g DO) which to hand off to should not it be able to at least know that it is a DO network?

 

Here is what I can trace from the MIIS

IE_NETWORK_TYPE => NETWORK_TYPE (Table 10, 6.5.4)

Under NETWORK_TYPE (Table F.13) which is a sequences of three choices.

The first choice is NULL or LINK_TYPE   (your amendment added three types of networks: DVB, T-DMB, and ATSC-M/N)

The second choice is NULL or SUBTYPE (your amendment does not include any changes/additions to table F.14 on Subtype)

                                Should it?  I think so, especially since in the description one is pointed to Table F.14 for details.

                               Minimally it should contain three new rows (one for each of the networks) with N/A in the network subtype column.

The third choice is NULL or TYPE_EXT (basically at the SDOs discretion)

 

Thank you for your reconsideration.

 

David Cypher

 

From: Zuniga, Juan Carlos [mailto:JuanCarlos.Zuniga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 5:36 PM
To: STDS-802-21@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-21] LB 4b comment resolution

 

Hello all,

 

Please take a look at the resolved comments from the 4b Letter Ballot and let us know if you have any comments:

https://mentor.ieee.org/802.21/dcn/11/21-11-0078-02-bcst-lb4b-comments.xls

 

Tomorrow the Task Group will concentrate efforts on the Motions required to issue a new recirculation for the next plenary meeting.

 

Regards,

 

Juan Carlos Zuniga

802.21b TG Chair