| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Hello Anthony, Yes, you are right. I should have referred to revision 06 instead of 05. Revision 06 on the 802.21 document repository does not show that the revisions in the document were accepted. However, it seems to me that we did accept them. So the new revision I am producing would be revision 07, starting from the existing 06 but with the existing 06 revisions accepted into the document. In this way, the further revisions in document 07 would not be confused with the already accepted revisions currently highlighted in revision 06. Is this correct? Regards, Charlie P. On 8/10/2012 8:06 AM, h chan wrote:
Charles, I guess you mean 06 and not 05. One would first accept all the revisions in 21-12-0067-06 before producing a new proposal. H Anthony Chan -----Original Message----- From: Charles E. Perkins [mailto:charles.perkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, August 06, 2012 5:21 PM To: STDS-802-21@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [STDS-802-21] Starting on revision ...-06 for 802.21(c) Hello folks, Is it O.K. for me to accept all the revisions in..-05 of the 802.21c specification that are noted as changes to the previous revision?
-- Regards, Charlie P.