Re: [802.3_100GNGOPTX] Preparations for January Plenary - Latest CrossCheck Sheet

[Daniel Dove <ddove@xxxxxxx>]

Matt,

According to Chris Di Minico, use of the word "obtuse" must result in a 30 day sentence in the cooler. Apparently, this was the result when the word was used in the movie "The Shawshank Redemption" and protocol must be maintained.    ;)

Personally, I find you complementary (pardon my geometric logic) and thus will respond in kind.

TF2 and TF2 are from the 5 Criteria presentation I attached earlier. Technical Feasibility 1, Technical Feasibility 2….

I numbered the responses to make them more clear.

Best Regards,

Dan

From: Matt Traverso <mattrave@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:50:33 -0600
To: Daniel Dove <ddove@xxxxxxx>, 100G Group <STDS-802-3-100GNGOPTX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [802.3_100GNGOPTX] Preparations for January Plenary - Latest CrossCheck Sheet

Hi Dan,

 

Sorry for being obtuse, but can you clarify the numbering of the each column?  For example I don’t understand the distinction between TF2 & TF3 (obviously both Technical Feasibility…).  I assumethis is pointing to another document with sub-bullets on the 5 criteria.

 

thanks

--matt

 

From: Daniel Dove [mailto:ddove@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 3:54 PM
To: STDS-802-3-100GNGOPTX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [802.3_100GNGOPTX] Preparations for January Plenary - Latest CrossCheck Sheet

 

Hi,

 

The leadership team has completed our review. Please use this sheet for your own analysis of the 5C coverage of presentations to date.

 

Best Regards,

 

Dan Dove