[8023-10GEPON] FEC call details
All,
The conference call for FEC is planned for Monday, September 11th, 9:30 AM
US Pacific time. The following is the bridge number, courtesy of the
Ethernet Alliance:
Dial in Number
1-866-228-9900
International Number
1-719-359-4032
Participant Passcode 383731
The bridge is reserved for 1.5 hrs. I hope this would be enough.
Glen
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Glen Kramer [mailto:glen.kramer@TEKNOVUS.COM]
> Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 12:50 PM
> To: STDS-802-3-10GEPON@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> Subject: Re: [8023-10GEPON] Presentation on FEC for 10G
>
> Frank,
>
>
> This is rather a short notice. I will see if I can reach the AE today. If
> not, I will find an alternative conference call facility and will post the
> details later tonight.
>
> Glen
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Frank Chang [mailto:ychang@VITESSE.COM]
> > Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 11:25 AM
> > To: STDS-802-3-10GEPON@listserv.ieee.org
> > Subject: Re: [8023-10GEPON] Presentation on FEC for 10G
> >
> > Glen;
> >
> > Right now the conf call. is planning to be next Monday 9:30AM PDT, no
> > conflicts heard so far. Could you provide a EA bridge for this? The
> agenda
> > is for FEC associated discussions. (I believe Frank E. is traveling.)
> >
> > Frank C.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Glen Kramer [mailto:glen.kramer@teknovus.com]
> > Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 11:08 AM
> > To: STDS-802-3-10GEPON@listserv.ieee.org
> > Subject: Re: [8023-10GEPON] Presentation on FEC for 10G
> >
> > Frank,
> >
> > Thank you for organizing the FEC discussions.
> >
> > Few people have asked me for a summary of the FEC call. Would you
please,
> > post to the reflector a short overview of the call: what was discussed
> and
> > any steps planned next.
> >
> > Also, if you plan another conf call, please announce it on the
reflector,
> > so
> > that those who are interested, but missed the first call could join this
> > time.
> >
> > I also want to remind everybody that the Ethernet Alliance has offered
> > 10GEPON group a sponsorship in a form of hosting conference calls.
> Please,
> > let me know if you would like to have a conference call in preparation
> for
> > the September meeting.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Glen
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Frank Effenberger [mailto:feffenberger@HUAWEI.COM]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 9:44 AM
> > > To: STDS-802-3-10GEPON@listserv.ieee.org
> > > Subject: [8023-10GEPON] Presentation on FEC for 10G
> > >
> > > Dear All,
> > >
> > > I am interested in putting together a presentation on FEC for 10G
> > (serial)
> > > PONs. Judging from the materials from the July meeting, I think that
> > > there
> > > is some common support for the following basic ideas:
> > >
> > > 1. FEC should be applied at the very lowest layer (streaming-FEC).
> > > 2. FEC should be a mandatory part of the line code.
> > > 3. FEC codeword size should be aligned with the other EPON structure
> > sizes
> > > (such as 66b blocks and MPCP time quanta)
> > >
> > > There are related topics that I don't think we've reached consensus
> on:
> > > a. Choice of basic FEC algorithm (e.g, RS, BCH, etc.)
> > > b. Line-rate increasing versus MAC-rate reducing approach
> > > c. Code-rate and objective gain values
> > > (some of these require collaboration with PMD specialists.)
> > >
> > > If there are people who are interested in working with me on a
> > > presentation
> > > on these topic areas, please let me know.
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > > Frank Effenberger
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Glen Kramer [mailto:glen.kramer@teknovus.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 5:04 PM
> > > To: STDS-802-3-10GEPON@listserv.ieee.org
> > > Subject: [8023-10GEPON] presentations for September meeting
> > >
> > > Dear colleagues,
> > >
> > > It appears that our next meeting will take place on September 18th and
> > > 19th
> > > (Monday and Tuesday) and the High-Speed SG will meet on 20th and 21st,
> > so
> > > there will be no overlap and interested people will be able to attend
> > both
> > > meetings.
> > >
> > > The meeting venue has not been finalized yet. A venue should be
> > announced
> > > at
> > > least 30 days before the meeting, so expect the announcement very
soon.
> > >
> > > Meanwhile, it is time to start working on presentations for the next
> > > meeting.
> > >
> > > There are many specific topics/features that we have to reach
> consensus
> > > on:
> > >
> > > Downstream Wavelength
> > > Upstream Wavelength
> > > Power budgets
> > > FEC: Optional or Mandatory
> > > FEC Category: Stream-based vs. Frame-based
> > > other topics - anything that is in scope of our PAR can be discussed.
> > >
> > > If you can think of any other topic not listed here, please propose it
> > on
> > > the reflector.
> > >
> > >
> > > If you have opinion on any of these or other topics, make a
> presentation
> > > with arguments in favor of it. Remember, a proposal should have > 75%
> > > support to get accepted as a baseline. It is a good idea to circulate
> > > proposals on the reflector and get feedback, and to enlist additional
> > > supporters.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Glen