Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re:RE: Free access to drafts



I also support open access to the drafts in progress. 
Fix something in the drafting process is much easier than make a revision after
the whole thing is completed. Open access will save us a lots of headache (and
work) in the future. I would rather worry about the draft is not distributed
wide enough. 

Hailing Zhong
Lucent Technologies
Member of Technical Staff
hzhong@xxxxxxxxxx
508-347-8654

____________________Reply Separator____________________
Subject:    RE: Free access to drafts 
Author: "Angel Rodriguez" <angelrod@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:       10/31/00 3:04 PM


I would like to add my support to open access to the drafts in progress.

I think it is extremely important for the ability of implementers to be able
to review the proposals.  Not everyone can actively participate in the
standards process as has been well explained in previous emails.  However,
the process, the standard and ultimately the marketplace would suffer if
access is limited.

Angel Rodriguez


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-3-hssg@xxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-stds-802-3-hssg@xxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Colin Mick
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 11:57 AM
To: stds-802-3-hssg@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Free access to drafts



I also support free access to drafts.
An open standards process requires open access to drafts in progress.
Early and broad exposure to a variety of inputs strengthens the final
product.
In past 802.3 standards efforts we have always welcomed input from folks
who did not have the opportunity to actively participate in meetings.

Colin Mick





 

Received: from horh1.emsr.lucent.com [135.17.1.40] by spectran.com (ccMail Link to SMTP R8.30.00.7)
	; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 16:34:06 -0400
Return-Path: <owner-stds-802-3-hssg@xxxxxxxx>
Received: from hoemail2.firewall.lucent.com by horh1.emsr.lucent.com (8.9.3+Sun/EMS-1.5 Solaris/emsr)
	id QAA18414 for <hzhong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 16:32:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from hoemail2.firewall.lucent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by hoemail2.firewall.lucent.com (Pro-8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA23391
	for <hzhong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 16:32:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ruebert.ieee.org (ruebert.ieee.org [199.172.136.3])
	by hoemail2.firewall.lucent.com (Pro-8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA23384
	for <hzhong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 16:32:10 -0500 (EST)
Received:  by ruebert.ieee.org (8.9.3/8.9.3)	id PAA21836; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 15:01:50 -0500 (EST)
From: "Angel Rodriguez" <angelrod@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <stds-802-3-hssg@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Free access to drafts
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 15:04:49 -0500
Message-ID: <NDBBJIOLKKNMKOMOCAKLOEKJCEAA.angelrod@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
In-Reply-To: <20001031.16572626@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Importance: Normal
Sender: owner-stds-802-3-hssg@xxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
X-Resent-To: Multiple Recipients <stds-802-3-hssg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Listname: stds-802-3-hssg
X-Info: [Un]Subscribe requests to  majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Moderator-Address: stds-802-3-hssg-approval@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx