Re: [STDS-802-3-400G] SMF Ad Hoc calls

[Jonathan King <jonathan.king@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

My 2 cents:

I think there may be some value in an initial discussion on June 2^nd.

Even if there’s no new presentation, an ad hoc  review of the old BTI and which ones we think can be removed would at least show where we agree or disagree

jonathan

 

From: David Lewis [mailto:David.Lewis@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 9:31 AM
To: STDS-802-3-400G@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-3-400G] SMF Ad Hoc calls

 

I’m with Gary on this.  I think June 2 is too soon.

David

 

From: Gary Nicholl (gnicholl) [mailto:gnicholl@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 7:24 AM
To: STDS-802-3-400G@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-3-400G] SMF Ad Hoc calls

 

I would vote for  June 9/23. 

 

Gary

 

From: <Anslow>, Peter <panslow@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: "Anslow, Peter" <panslow@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 at 4:26 AM
To: "STDS-802-3-400G@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <STDS-802-3-400G@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [STDS-802-3-400G] SMF Ad Hoc calls

 

Hi,

 

Two possible schedules for SMF Ad Hoc calls have been proposed:

 

Three calls on Tuesdays June 2, 16 and 30 with the first call to re-establish what the “Big ticket items” are to enable adoption of baselines for the remaining project objectives.

 

Two calls on Tuesdays June 9 and 23.

 

The first option would have a call only one week after the Pittsburgh meeting.  Will people be ready with presentations by then?

 

Comments?

 

Pete Anslow |Senior Standards Advisor
43-51 Worship Street | London, EC2A 2DX, UK
Direct +44 2070 125535 |