Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-3-400G] Electrical Ad-Hoc Straw Poll



I vote with Rich and Rick, Option 4

 

From: Rick Rabinovich [mailto:rrabinovich@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 10:59 AM
To: STDS-802-3-400G@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-3-400G] Electrical Ad-Hoc Straw Poll

 

My vote is option 4.

 

Rick Rabinovich

Hardware Architect – Signal Integrity

cid:image007.png@01CE6DA7.29CB7A10

rrabinovich@xxxxxxxxxxx

Phone: +1 (818) 208-7328

26601 W. Agoura Rd.

Calabasas, CA 91302 US

visit: www.ixiacom.com

 

From: Richard Mellitz [mailto:richard.mellitz@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 5:11 AM
To: STDS-802-3-400G@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-3-400G] Electrical Ad-Hoc Straw Poll

 

I vote for option 4

... Rich

Sent from my iPhone


On Apr 26, 2017, at 4:28 AM, Andre Szczepanek <aszczepanek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

At today’s P802.3bs Electrical Ad-Hoc meeting I announced we would have a straw poll on options for the C2M Insertion Loss equation based on discussion following the presentation of mellitz_01b_042417_elect.

 

  • Option 1: Do nothing
  • Option 2:

       Change  “The supported insertion loss budget is characterized by Equation (120E–1) and illustrated in Figure 120E–4. “  to “The recommended insertion loss budget is characterized by Equation (120E–1) and illustrated in Figure 120E–4. “

       Add “recommended” to the title of Figure 120E-4.

  • Option 3: Change the insertion loss equation to the equation given in Slide 14 “Option B” of mellitz_01b_042417_elect.
  • Option 4: Implement the changes in both options 2 & 3 above.

 

Please send me an email specifying your preferred option (select only one).

-        Don’t get hung up on exact values. This is a straw poll, nothing is definitive – we just want to establish a direction for the group.

 

Regards

                 Andre Szczepanek (Electrical Ad Hoc chair)