| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
If you intend to respond to the pair-to-pair resistance unbalance straw poll and have not done so yet, please respond today (Monday, August 25, 2014), to: ydarshan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; and
George@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Participants in the last 2 meetings of the ad hoc, from whom we have not received responses will receive a separate email. For reference, the straw poll was: ---- Please reply to
YDarshan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx and
George@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (AND NOT to ALL or the Reflector!) At the August 19 meeting of the End to End Channel Pair to Pair Resistance Unbalance Ad hoc, the following straw poll was proposed (discussion notes materials relating to the straw poll’s subject can be found
in the last few ad hoc meeting notes and contributions): Please respond with: OPTION 1, OPTION 2, OR ABSTAIN Option 1: Current base line text with 0.1 ohm or 7.5% whichever is greater, as follows: 33.1.4.3 Pair Operation Channel Requirement for Pair to Pair Resistance Unbalance 4P pair operation requires the
specification of resistance unbalance between each two pairs of the channel, not greater than 100 milliohms or 7.5% whichever is greater. Resistance unbalance between the channel pairs is a measure of the difference of resistance of the common mode pairs of
conductors used for power delivery. Channel pair to pair resistance unbalance is defined by… Option 2: Equation of the form C_P2PRUNB = (Rmax –
Rmin + 0.08Ω) / (Rmax +
Rmin + 0.032Ω) ---- George Zimmerman Principal, CME Consulting Experts in Advanced PHYsical Communications Technology george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 310-920-3860 (PLEASE NOTE NEW EMAIL ADDRESS.
THE OTHER WILL STILL WORK, BUT PLEASE USE THIS FOR CME BUSINESS) |