I agree with it with Lennart’s addition – of course, the table cross-reference in the existing text is incorrect, but that’s a different comment (that I made).
-george
From: Tremblay, David [mailto:david.tremblay@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 1:14 PM
To: STDS-802-3-4PPOE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [802.3_4PPOE] cmjones TDL
Chad,
Looks good, including Lennart’s recommended addition.
Regards,
David Tremblay
From: Yseboodt, Lennart [mailto:lennart.yseboodt@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2016 11:11 PM
To: STDS-802-3-4PPOE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [802.3_4PPOE] cmjones TDL
Hi Chad,
Looks good, this gets rid of an awkward construct.
I would further suggest:
To get rid of the word "encoded" wherever it is used.
eg: The PD measured voltage value is according to Table 79-7f, where X is aLldpXDot3....
Kind regards,
Lennart
________________________________________
From: Chad Jones (cmjones) <cmjones@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2016 17:26
To: STDS-802-3-4PPOE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [802.3_4PPOE] cmjones TDL
All, please find the resolution for my TDL attached. Recall that my AI was to find a resolution to the statement ‘decimal value of bits’ in 30 and 79. If you care about these sections, I would expect you to look at the attached and give feedback if you have
any. It should only take 5 minutes of your time (unless you disagree and have to send me feedback…). I will be submitting this document as a remedy to one of my comments against D2.1.
Chad Jones
Tech Lead, Cisco Systems
Chair, IEEE P802.3bt 4PPoE Task Force