| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Miklos, I too support this added functionality as it allows more choice in the PSE IC architecture. As Yair points out, it is optional. That means that no one has to throw away their current development.
I hope we get time to discuss this in New Orleans but, since it is not related to a comment, it will be among the last things we do. I would also recommend that we get baseline ready to support the change to review in Berlin. Then, submit
the comment and baseline against the 3.0 cycle that will (we expect) happen after Berlin. Therefore, we wouldn’t be adding this until September. Chad Jones Tech Lead, Cisco Systems Chair, IEEE P802.3bt 4PPoE Task Force From: Miklós Lukács <Miklos.Lukacs@xxxxxxxxxx> Thank you Yair! Miklos From: Yair Darshan [mailto:YDarshan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Hi Miklos, Please see my comments inside. It looks as very nice feature. I support to drive it in parallel to our activities since I don’t see that it will cause us delays. The changes to PSE is minor and it is optional feature. I would like to hear the group opinion as well and we can do it at the meeting. Nice presentation. Regards Yair From: Miklós Lukács [mailto:Miklos.Lukacs@xxxxxxxxxx]
EXTERNAL EMAIL Dear All, I would like to present the attached presentation in New Orleans. I would highly appreciate your review prior. Please help me to make my proposal successful and provide feedback for me. The idea just came to my mind in the past weeks unfortunately. I know we are very late in the process, and what I want the least is to cause any delay in releasing the standard. A proposal of how to achieve this is also included into the presentation. Thank you, Miklos |