| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Gary, Thank you for the feedback. After reviewing the history of how the responses / discussions / changes occurred, I want to point out to everyone that the project documentation should not just be viewed as an administrative exercise. And why these documents and there generation should not be taken for granted. Regards, John D’Ambrosia Chair, IEEE 802.3 Beyond 10km Optical PHYs Study Group From: Gary Nicholl (gnicholl) <gnicholl@xxxxxxxxx> Thanks. After quickly reviewing the presentation I prefer the alternative and simpler version of the compatibility slide (consistent with what was done in 802.3cd). We spent a lot of time on the call last week trying to modify/update the compatibility slide, and I think in the end we were overcomplicating things. After the call I went back and looked at the version we used for 802.3cd and I believe it is sufficient for this project as well. Both project involve defining new physical layers, and with the intent of leveraging existing PCS/FEC where possible (in the case of 802.3cd the new 200G PHYs reused the 200G PCS defined in 802.3bs). Gary From: John DAmbrosia <jdambrosia@xxxxxxxxx> Material for the April 10 100GbE CSD Response Ad hoc call have been posted - http://www.ieee802.org/3/B10K/public/adhoc/18_0410/index.shtml Information for the teleconference may be found at - http://www.ieee802.org/3/B10K/email/msg00120.html. Regards, John D’Ambrosia Chair, IEEE 802.3 Beyond 10km Optical PHYs Study Group To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-B10K list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-B10K&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-B10K list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-B10K&A=1 |