Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802.3_RTPGE] PHY & cabling objectives



This is a super idea : a tutorial is a wonderful thing!

 

Best regards ,

Yakov Belopolsky

Manager , R&D

Bel Stewart Connector

 

 

 


From: Brad Booth [mailto:Brad_Booth@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 3:51 PM
To: STDS-802-3-RTPGE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [802.3_RTPGE] PHY & cabling objectives

 

Marek,

 

A good point. Often study groups have used tutorials to help others understand new markets and concepts. Probably something that Steve Carlson and his team may wish to consider to help set the stage for the PAR.

 

Cheers,

Brad

 

 

From: Marek Hajduczenia [mailto:marek.hajduczenia@xxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 2:21 PM
To: Booth, Brad; STDS-802-3-RTPGE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [802.3_RTPGE] PHY & cabling objectives

 

Brad,

 

Just one small note – for those not participating directly in the SG work, it might be beneficial to define clearly (or point to a reference where it would be defined) what “automotive” and “industrial” environment really means. I am sure it is obvious to all folks involved in the SG, but also wider 802.3 membership will have to understand these terms prior to taking a vote.

 

Just my 5 euro-cents

 

Marek

 

From: Brad Booth [mailto:Brad_Booth@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: 25 June 2012 20:10
To: STDS-802-3-RTPGE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [802.3_RTPGE] PHY & cabling objectives

 

Mehmet,

 

Thanks again for arranging today’s conference call. Lots of great discussion.

 

George Zimmerman and I were talking off-line about potential objectives. Objectives are tough because the study group needs them to bound the scope of the project without limiting the potential for the task force to consider multiple solutions. 

 

With that in mind, here’s some potential considerations:

 

Define a twisted-pair copper cabling channel model(s) that supports:

·       Fewer than four twisted-pairs

·       X connectors

 

Define a 1000 Mb/s PHY that would support channels of:

·       At least 40 m in an automotive environment

·       At least x m in an industrial environment

 

The number of connectors still needs to be defined, and there also needs to be some presentations around the reach requirements for the markets/applications.

 

It would also be interesting to get feedback from those participating in the study group about whether or not the study group might wish to consider a reach for the shorter-reach consumer market.

 

Cheers,
Brad

 

 

Brad Booth

Director, Network Architecture

Social Media and Community Professional

Dell | Office of the CTO, Networking

brad_booth@xxxxxxxx

office +1-512-723-7106, mobile +1-503-830-9366