| That is fine with me.
Geoff
Yan, I agree with these changes suggested by Geoff except: DRAFT OBJECTIVES Page 2 Currently: Define a YANG module for Ethernet passive optical networks (EPON). Should be: Define YANG modules for Ethernet passive optical networks (EPON) Optical Line Terminals (OLT) and Optical Network Units (ONU) and Optical Network Terminals (ONT). Best Regards, Duane FutureWei Technologies Inc. Director, Access R&D 919 418 4741 Raleigh, NC Yan- Just took a look at your docs. I have some suggested changes. Currently: Standard for YANG data model definitions for Ethernet Should be: Standard for YANG data model definitions for Ethernet station management Your PAR date items 4.2 and 4.3 appear to be pretty aggressive for a new work. There is no downside to giving yourself more time. Currently: YANG is specified in Request For Comment (RFC) 6020 and amendments / corrigenda Should be: YANG is specified in IETF Request For Comment (RFC) 6020 and amendments / corrigenda Currently: This project will develop YANG models from Clause 30 objects... Should be: This project will develop YANG models of the definitions from Clause 30 objects... Currently: The proposed amendment will enable the use of YANG model for a wide variety... Should be: The proposed standard will enable the use of YANG model of 802.3 managed objects for a wide variety... Add a bullet: This work is fully aligned to and coordinated with equivalent work taking place in 802.1. Add a bullet: This work will not be compatible with SNMP. This is an obsolete requirement. Currently: Other SDOs (e.g., MEF and IETF) have already defined YANG data models and there is... Should be: Other SDOs (e.g., MEF and IETF) have already defined YANG data models for managing and operating Ethernets and there is... Currently: Define a YANG module for Ethernet passive optical networks (EPON). Should be: Define YANG modules for Ethernet passive optical networks (EPON) Optical Network Units (ONU) and Optical Network Terminals (ONT). Hi Folks, Thank you for the good discussion during the call. I have uploaded the draft meeting minutes and the revised CSD/Objectives documents per comments during the call, which can be found at: Please review the draft minutes and updated CSD/Objectives documents to see if your points have been covered or anything missing. Draft PAR hasn’t been discussed yet but would also invite your review and comments. Though the next ad hoc call will be on May 6th, please feel free to share your comments/corrections via the reflector before that to facilitate the work. Thank you very much for your time and feedbacks. Best Regards, Yan
|