Channel Ad Hoc telecon minutes 
November 2, 2005

802.3ap task force interim meeting in Vancouver 11/13-14 and 11/15-18

802.3 meeting in Vancouver 11/13-18
802.3ap extra meetings 1-6 Sunday
802.3ap extra meetings 8:30-11 Monday morning
802.3ap normal meetings Tue-Thur

presentation deadline for Vancouver meetings is 11/9 midnight

old business
1. discuss comments 259,262,299,578, etc to Annex 69A, then Int Tol
2. comment 105...moore_c2_1105
3. resolve comment 300 if Joe Abler wants to pursue it

new business
1. discuss Annex 69a and Int Tol comments
2. discuss compliance channel comments 86,103,322,581
3. discuss extrapolation to BER comments 106,169,332,333

Charles presented moore_c2_1105

Combined jitter tolerance and interference tolerance test

Some questioned why do both in one test?

One point was to get jitter tolerance coverage similar to previous specs.

One point was to firm up a compliant transmitter spec.

There is presently equipment to create a de-emphasized TX waveform. With that said, 

Straw Poll #1
"What test, int tol and/or jit tol, should be run on the receiver"
-Chicago Rules-
A. int tol only			= 4			
B. both same time		= 7		
C. both separately		= 7	
D. jitter tolerance only	= 1

The OIF has a similar RX test. Why aren't we trying to align better with OIF?

Doing all this at one time seems complicated.

Asking for volunteers to write up option C. CEI draft 2.0 is available for a template.

Straw Poll #2
"Should the compliance channel be the same or lossier than Amax?"
Yes= 5
No= 1
Abstain= 4

An attendee requested that the data generator should be specified more definitively.

The comments must be resolved in Vancouver, so please bring in presentations on either item B or C since they were most popular.

Charles presented moore_c1_1105 which will be discussed in Vancouver.