Re: [BP] Presentation
We didn't. It seems to be drawing a better picture of what works and
what doesn't. I plan on taking some time and "kick the tires". We didn't
get much chance for this at the last meeting. The bottom line is that
with two independent eye-opening simulators we didn't get the prescribed
channel to pass.
... Rich
-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Moore [mailto:charles.moore@avagotech.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 3:29 AM
To: STDS-802-3-BLADE@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [BP] Presentation
john,
I notice in your supporting slides that most of your comparisons
are to baumer_03_06. I do not recall that we voted to include those
specs into D2.4
charles
DAmbrosia, John F wrote:
> All,
>
> I forwarded a thread to the reflector regarding issues with the ATCA
> channel data we had. This and other channel related issues that Rich
> and I have come across are shown in the following -
>
> ___http://ieee802.org/3/ap/public/reference/dambrosia_r1_0306.pdf_
>
> Cheers!
>
> John D'Ambrosia
>
>
--
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Charles Moore
| Avago Technologies
| ISD
| charles.moore@avagotech.com
| (970) 288-4561
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|