Re: [EFM] EFM Requirements
Sukanta:
relative to your comment:
> An active architecture within the field isn general
>is not a good idea,
I'm not sure what you base this on, but for all intents and purposes every major deployment in existence has active components in the field. All-passive is in fact the "new idea" as is all optical.
> I would be extremely interested in discussing the
>active component network on different scale of
>operation as opposed to a PON as far as cost/ease of
>deployment and maintainence, complexity etc is
>concerned.
Agreed, I would too.
Get 250 color business cards for FREE!
http://businesscards.lycos.com/vp/fastpath/