Re: [EFM] Bug in definition of OAMDiscoveryState values (Annex 30B)
If Matt is correct in when the error crept into the draft, it would not
be classified as an errata. The easiest and fastest way to get this
fixed is to submit a comment on the upcoming 802.3REVam WG ballot.
>[mailto:email@example.com] On Behalf Of
>Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 6:09 AM
>Subject: [EFM] Bug in definition of OAMDiscoveryState values
>It seems to me that there is a missing enumerated value in the
>OAMDiscoveryState in Annex 30B on page 193 of draft 3.3.
>There are only 5
>states listed in that definition, with the value for "send
>local remote OK"
>missing. In 22.214.171.124.4 (page 49), aOAMDiscoveryState is shown
>with all 6
>values (agreeing with the definition in clause 57, figure 57-5
>on page 231).
>If you agree with me, and as this is now an approved standard,
>could this be
>added to the list of maintenance items please?
>The consequence of this bug is that you can't tell that an
>has moved to the "send local remote OK" state. I don't know
>what value an
>implmentation of D3.3 should send when in "send local remote OK".
> -- John
>John Messenger (JMessenger@advaoptical.com)
>R&D Manager, Software
>ADVA Optical Networking Ltd.