Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802.3_EPOC] Exclusion bandwidth question



Hi Matt,

We were trying to specify the minimum required granularity.  I agree that it could be less but it must be able to handle 6MHz granularity for the downstream so an operator could fill in any number of QAM channels with EPoC.  This requirement is focusing on muting sub-carriers for the purpose of fitting into a spectrum plan with existing services.  It is not a requirement for muting carriers due to impairments.

Hope that helps,
Ed...

From: Matthew Schmitt [mailto:m.schmitt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 1:40 PM
To: STDS-802-3-EPOC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [802.3_EPOC] Exclusion bandwidth question

With apologies for missing the first part of the call, I wanted to follow up on the discussion of exclusion bandwidth in the presentation materials that were reviewed on the call.

In particular, I wanted to ask the following question: is there any reason why we can't have granularity down to the level of a sub-carrier?  Why does it need to be 6 or 8 MHz in the downstream, or 6.4 or 3.2 or 1.6 MHz in the upstream?  Is there a reason we can't just mute individual sub-carriers?  Does it really impact the complexity of the solution that much?  Or is it more a concern regarding how deeply an individual sub-carrier can be muted?  I'd like to better understand the implications and the tradeoffs here before I jump to one conclusion or another.

Thanks!

Matt

________________________________

<="" p="">

________________________________________________________________________

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-EPOC list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-EPOC&A=1