Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802.3_EPOC] OFDMA information



Would "multiple, independent, not necessarily adjacent carriers" be more accurate?

Geoff

On 810//12 9:41 AM, David Barr wrote:
Non-adjacent-->  Non-Overlapping (seems a better choice).
-Dave

From: Hal Roberts [mailto:Hal.Roberts@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 9:12 AM
To: IEEE ORG
Subject: Re: [802.3_EPOC] OFDMA information

Leo,

*          The document you sent says, "Frequency sub-channels are composed of multiple, non-adjacent carriers"

The diagram seems to indicate that the sub-channels are composed of multiple, adjacent carriers.

Can you clarify the statement quoted above?

Thanks,

Hal

From: Leo Montreuil [mailto:leo.montreuil@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 10:09 AM
To: STDS-802-3-EPOC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:STDS-802-3-EPOC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [802.3_EPOC] OFDMA information

This is not a proposal  for OFDMA. This information is to help defining what is OFDMA.

OFDMA: Multiple Access scheme using Orthogonal Frequency-Division Multiplexing  where sub-channels are allocated in the frequency domain. The sub-channels are allocated to individual users.

Thank you
Leo Montreuil
Broadcom

________________________________

<="" p="">

________________________________

<="" p="">

________________________________________________________________________

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-EPOC list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-EPOC&A=1


________________________________________________________________________

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-EPOC list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-EPOC&A=1