Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-3-EPOC] Slides from today's RF Spectrum call



Rick,
Currently we have not set a limit on the number of internal exclusion bands. I recall this being briefly mentioned some time ago but I am not aware of any straw poll of vote on the idea. I suspect operators are well aware that if they chop up the spectrum they will get less than optimal performance.
The bit mask idea has not been proposed at this point (I'm assuming you would need a mask of 192 bits, is that the idea?). You are certainly free to make such a contribution. IEEE is contribution driven as I'm sure you are aware.
These questions would be addressed in the RF Spectrum Ad Hoc not the Channel Model.
Best Regards,
Duane

FutureWei Technologies Inc.
duane.remein@xxxxxxxxxx
Director, Access R&D
919 418 4741
Raleigh, NC

From: Rick Li [mailto:Rick.Li@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 5:56 PM
To: Duane Remein; STDS-802-3-EPOC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [STDS-802-3-EPOC] Slides from today's RF Spectrum call

Duane and all,


(1)    With up to 3 exclusion bands, and the minimum contiguous DS spectrum of 24MHz, it is likely to create small fragments of unusable spectrum in between the exclusion bands and EPOC bands, especially below 1002MHz as there are various existing services and different regions/MSOs have different channel allocations.

(2)    Are three exclusion bands adequate or there might be scenarios where more than 3 exclusion bands may be valuable or even necessary (to protect pieces of legacy services for example)?


(3)    Instead of trying to define up to three exclusion bands of variable width, should we entertain the approach where many fixed width (small) exclusion bands can be use and represented by a bit map and bit mask? For example, 8MHz (or 6MHz) fixed width, if a bit is set in the mask, then this band is excluded.


As I have not been able to attend the channel Ad hoc, perhaps these questions were already discussed and addressed.

Best, Rick

From: Duane Remein [mailto:Duane.Remein@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 12:32 PM
To: STDS-802-3-EPOC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-3-EPOC] Slides from today's RF Spectrum call

Attached

Mark,
Please post

Best Regards,
Duane

FutureWei Technologies Inc.
duane.remein@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:duane.remein@xxxxxxxxxx>
Director, Access R&D
919 418 4741
Raleigh, NC


________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-EPOC list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-EPOC&A=1