Re: [FE] Plans for San Antonio, etc

[Geoff Thompson <gthompso@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 02:46 PM 11/12/2004 -0800, Pat Thaler wrote:
> More importantly, what we put in
> the standard needs to make clear whether the length field may be used
> with extended frames. There are at least three possible
> alternatives:
>
> Type field only: Require that frames larger than 1535 bytes use a type
> value in the Length/Type Field. 
>
> ...
>
> Personally I favor the type field only alternative because I don't know
> of any need for the length interpretation with these frames.

I always assume that this was where we would go.

Geoff