Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Re: Signal vs. Idle debate (was: Here's a new idea)

To: Geoff Thompson <gthompso@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Signal vs. Idle debate (was: Here's a new idea)
From: Norman Finn <nfinn@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 09 May 2000 14:13:06 -0700
CC: stds-802-3-pwrviamdi@xxxxxxxx
Organization: Cisco Systems
References: <4.2.0.58.20000508161655.0098de20@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-stds-802-3-pwrviamdi@xxxxxxxx

Geoff Thompson wrote:
> 
> We are fully aware of the impact that proprietary implementations have on
> the marketplace.
> 
> We are also aware of the imapct that true consensus Standards can have on
> the marketplace.
> 
> ...

Good arguments, Geoff, and right on the money.  That's why I participate
in the IEEE standards process, anyway.

-- Norm

References:
- RE: Signal vs. Idle debate (was: Here's a new idea)
  - From: Geoff Thompson

Prev by Date: Re: Boredom
Next by Date: RE: Signal vs. Idle debate (A picture is worth a thousand words)
Prev by thread: RE: Signal vs. Idle debate (was: Here's a new idea)
Next by thread: RE: Signal vs. Idle debate (was: Here's a new idea)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread