Re: +++PROPOSED RULE CHANGE LETTER BALLOT
*Important rules change.
*I'm not really happy with the term "non-draft standard". I don't have a better idea (maybe "NOT[draft standard]"?), but I hope someone can come up with something.
>The following rule change was approved for LMSC ballot at the July Plenary
>meeting. There has been some confusion on how to conduct this "paper ballot"
>since it is being done via the WEB:
>1) Please submit your rule change ballot comments to me at email@example.com. I
>would like to receive these ballot comments by 1November.
>2) Buzz, please distribute this rule change ballot to the IEEE 802 reflector
>3) I will assume that Bill Lidinsky and Paul Nikolich will handle
>consolidating the comments and hold an ad-hoc ballot resolution meeting at
>the November Plenary meeting. Jim Carlo