Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

FW: Meet w/ the Stds Board in 2002




> From: 	Rigsbee, Everett O
> Sent: 	Tuesday, April 18, 2000 3:22 PM
> To: 	'802 J Carlo'
> Subject: 	RE: Meet w/ the Stds Board in 2002
> 
> Jim,  It will work fine with current Hotel arrangements.  It may even help to soften the blow of our canceling the Friday Closing Plenary.  No one was suggesting doing the two meetings in parallel.  The Thursday - Saturday agenda proposed by Howard seems quite workable and allows full participation by those who do both.  I even think the presence of the Stds Board may encourage more folks to stay over to see what it's about and hopefully see their standards get approved on the spot.  I also think a few of the Stds Board members may plan to come in a day or two early to get a chance to see 802 in action.  
> To me this looks like a true Win-Win scenario with no losers.  We should do our best to promote the idea !!!
> 
> Thanx,  Buzz
> Everett O. (Buzz) Rigsbee
> Boeing SSG
> PO Box 3707, M/S: 7M-FM
> Seattle, WA  98124-2207
> ph: (425) 865-2443, fx: (425) 865-6721
> email:  everett.o.rigsbee@boeing.com
> 
> ----------
> From: 	Jim Carlo[SMTP:jcarlo@ti.com]
> Sent: 	Sunday, April 09, 2000 1:25 AM
> To: 	IEEE802
> Cc: 	dawns@facetoface-events.com; dmoro@netcom.ca
> Subject: 	Meet w/ the Stds Board in 2002
> 
> Taking into account:
> 1) Standards Board Meetings Series are for three days. Howard, Geoff and I
> are busy MOST of the time those three days, so it is not clear how we can
> multiplex between the 802 meetings and the Standards Board Meetings.
> 2) Holding these meetings in parallel would make submissions into NesCom and
> RevCom awkward timings. Normally SEC approves the final submissions on
> Thursday evening, so the IEEE meetings would need to occur after this.
> The result is that a reasonable (or unreasonable) meeting schedule would be:
> IEEE 802 - Mon, Tues, Wed, Thurs
> IEEE Standards Board - Fri, Sat, Sun  (or possibly Thur, Fri Sat)
> This may not work well with current hotel agreements, but we could pursue.
> The other issue is that there will be little direct interaction with 802,
> since most leave quickly after the meetings are over.
> Jim Carlo(jcarlo@ti.com) Cellular:1-214-693-1776 Voice&Fax:1-214-853-5274
> TI Fellow, Networking Standards at Texas Instruments
> Chair, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6 Telecom and Info Exchange Between Systems
> Chair, IEEE802 LAN/MAN Standards Committee
> From: owner-stds-802-sec@ieee.org [mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@ieee.org]On
> Behalf Of Paul Nikolich
> Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2000 7:53 PM
> To: Howard Frazier; stds-802-sec@ieee.org; hfrazier@cisco.com;
> Everett.Rigsbee@PSS.Boeing.com
> Cc: dawns@facetoface-events.com; dmoro@netcom.ca
> Subject: RE: Meet w/ the Stds Board in 2002
> Howard and all,
> I like the idea--let's get 802 closer to the Stds Board--it can only help.
> Sooner is better in my opinion--let's try to make it happen for March 2001.
> How about Boston for March 2002 (downtown Boston this time Buzz)?
> --Paul
> At 05:15 PM 4/6/00 -0700, Howard Frazier wrote:
> >Buzz,
> >I think that they are planning to stay in Piscataway for 2001, though
> >we might be able to convince them otherwise.
> >I wanted to start with a meeting that we hadn't nailed down yet, so
> >that we wouldn't affect any of our existing hotel contracts.
> >I think that the venue choice would be up to us, and the board could
> >decide to come along for the ride if they wanted.
> >Have you met Terry Steenweg before?  Shall I make an introduction so
> >that we can start looking into the details?
> >Any reaction from the rest of the SEC?  Jim, Geoff, Howard, Tony, Buzz
> >and Roger seem to like the idea.  Any body see a problem?
> >Howard
> 
>