Re: FW: 802all: Proposed Rules Change
I don't think that is good enough. I don't recall that there is any mandate
that "the weekly agenda" be published. Further, if something became
contentious it might not turn out that "TWA" was the "official" notice.
Dawn updates it constantly so there is no advance notice requirement on it,
Before "The Dark and Stormy Night" I would not have thought this would be
an issue but the current rule on specific definition of the time slot in
the Operating Rules is in there for good reason.
At 10:41 AM 5/17/00 -0700, Howard Frazier wrote:
>The start time and the end time of the thursday evening meeting are
>published on the weekly agenda which is posted on the bulletin board
>outside the registration office.
>----- Begin Included Message -----
>From: Keith Amundsen <email@example.com>
>To: "'Howard Frazier'" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>Subject: FW: 802all: Proposed Rules Change
>Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 07:48:24 -0400
>Please forward as appropriate.
>Howard, et al,
>If the old Thursday evening wording was useful, the new wording now seems
>unclear. When is "announced time" decided and be whom; is it clear enough
>both for business to be concluded, and for people's travel reservations?
>From: Howard Frazier [mailto:email@example.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2000 9:10 PM
>Subject: 802all: Proposed Rules Change
>ATTENTION: All IEEE 802 Attendees !!!
>Dear members of the IEEE 802 LMSC,
>The Executive Committee of the IEEE 802 LMSC is considering a change
>to our operating rules which would eliminate the Friday morning
>closing plenary meeting. The text of the proposed rule change can
>be found at:
>Recording Secretary IEEE 802 LMSC
>----- End Included Message -----