Re: My proposed process for recommending changes to SEC ballots
At 20:54 28/09/00 -0400, RDLove wrote:
>Buzz, I am concerned about the size of the attachments and the ease of
>reading them. Therefore, I would like to recommend that we DON'T use MS
>Word for ballots, but rather, when we want to indicate changes do it as
>follows:
Bob -
We have a web site - what's wrong with doing what we do for WG ballots -
placing the Word files on there & including a URL in the ballot
announcement? I agree with Buzz - using the change tracking facilities in
Word would make it a lot easier to comment on the text. Commented versions
could then be posted on the website alongside the original.
Regards,
Tony