|Thread Links||Date Links|
|Thread Prev||Thread Next||Thread Index||Date Prev||Date Next||Date Index|
UPDATED STATUS: PLEASE VOTE Howard Frazier - Approve Bob Grow - Approve Paul Nikolich - Buzz Rigsbee - Approve with Comment Vic Hayes - Approve Tony Jeffree - Approve Geoff Thompson - Bob Love - Approve Stuart Kerry - Bob Heile - Roger Marks - Jim Carlo - Chair I am responding in the affirmative although I think the statement about "developing new PHYs as necessary" should be deleted. If a new PHY is required, a separate PAR will be submitted for approval and should be announced at that point in time. We don't want to give the impressions that they have license to create new PHYs without a separate justification and approval cycle. Thanx, Buzz ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ SEC OFFICIAL EMAIL BALLOT 802.0/28Nov2000 Issue Date: 10Nov2000 Closing Date: 6Dec2000 Moved By: Jim Carlo Move: Approve (in principal) the Attached Press Release for 802.17 The Standards Board is expected to approve the Project for Resilient Packet Rings on 7December2000. This notice is intended to be released at this time, so I ask your indulgence for a speedy ballot. I will send out a ballot updated tally on Friday. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Notes: 1) This press release was discussed on the 802.17 reflector. A final tally of members of the reflector, after several rewordings was 18-0-0. 2) Note that I expect IEEE-SA to reword, so this is approved "in principal".