RE: [802SEC] Proposed Alternative to changing the rules for WGme mbership
At 16:19 25/09/2002 -0600, THALER,PAT (A-Roseville,ex1) wrote:
>I disagree with you about the impact of the change to the rule on gaining
>membership. There are very large numbers of casual attendees who attend
>two 802.3 meetings. Requiring attendence of three meetings to gain voting
>rights filters out casual attendees. Granting voting rights for those who
>attend just two meetings could make it difficult to close ballots or get
>David Law could provide actual numbers, but I would say it isn't unusual
>for 802.3 to have 30 to 50 people per plenary cycle who have attended two
>meetings but don't attend the third.
Its a fair point - in that case, retaining the 3 meeting requirement for
gaining a vote is a good idea.