RE: [802SEC] Re: Request SEC Motion: P1802.16.1/D2 to RevCom
I will second Roger's motion ...
Carl R. Stevenson
Chair, IEEE 802.18 Radio Regulatory Technical Advisory Group
610-965-8799 (home office)
610-712-3217 (fax mailbox)
Short Message Service: firstname.lastname@example.org
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Nikolich [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 2:15 PM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org; Roger B. Marks
> Cc: email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: [802SEC] Re: Request SEC Motion: P1802.16.1/D2 to RevCom
> You'll need someone on the SEC to second the motion first.
> If there is an SEC member that is willing to second the motion, please
> indicate that to me and Roger.
> Thank you,
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Roger B. Marks" <email@example.com>
> To: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Cc: <email@example.com>; <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 1:56 PM
> Subject: Request SEC Motion: P1802.16.1/D2 to RevCom
> > Paul:
> > I request that the following motion be entered as an SEC
> email ballot:
> > MOTION: To forward IEEE P1802.16.1/D2-2002 ("Draft Standard for
> > Conformance to IEEE Standard 802.16 - Part 1: Protocol
> > Conformance Statements for 10-66 GHz WirelessMAN-SC Air Interface")
> > for Sponsor Ballot.
> > Here is an explanation:
> > The Working Group Letter Ballot results are clean. 802.16's Letter
> > Ballot #9 ("To forward IEEE P1802.16.1/D1-2002 for LMSC Sponsor
> > Ballot") ran from 21 Nov to 21 Dec. The results were:
> > Approve: 41 Disapprove: 0 Approval Ratio: 100% [75% required]
> > Abstain: 8 Ballots: 49 Return Ratio: 59% [50% required]
> > Comments: 77
> > Responses were developed by a Ballot Resolution Committee, and
> > P1802.16.1/D2 was issued. The comments, responses, and draft were
> > subject to 15-day Recirculation Ballot #9a (31 Dec 2002 - 14 Jan
> > 2003). No responses were received. Therefore, the ballot is closed
> > and final.
> > For a full report of the Letter Ballot, see
> > <http://ieee802.org/16/tgc/C1/ballot09/report9.html>.
> > I am asking for an email vote instead of waiting until the March
> > meeting because I believe that approval will give us an excellent
> > chance of making the 14 April RevCom deadline. Here is the schedule:
> > http://ieee802.org/16/tgc/C1/schedule.html
> > The Sponsor Ballot Group is already in place.
> > Thanks,
> > Roger