RE: [802SEC] November Plenary survey results
Bill, If we do a follow-up via the Web-Reg form for next time we will have all that data available in one table.
Dr. Everett O. (Buzz) Rigsbee
Boeing - SSG
PO Box 3707, M/S: 7M-FM
Seattle, WA 98124-2207
(425) 865-2443 Fx: (425) 865-6721
From: Bill Quackenbush [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 6:06 PM
To: Geoff Thompson
Cc: IEEE 802 SEC; firstname.lastname@example.org
Subject: Re: [802SEC] Novenber Plenary survey results
I would need membership numbers from the WGs/TAGs (which I don't have)
to compute the relative response from each group. I could do the
analysis for each WG/TWG or for groups of WGs/TAGs, but it would take a
lot of time even if I did the analysis for only .3 and .11.
The survey was nominally anonymous. So while some participants
identified themselves, most did not. Therefore graphing question 13 for
a group or groups that must be identified by name is not practical.
Geoff Thompson wrote:
> The biggest thing that I see is that the responses are skewed towards .11
> and away from .3.
> It might be helpful to show %age response from the membership/attendance of
> each group.
> That is, the dot 11 management might want to take the survey results more
> seriously than the dot 3 managment.
> Also, perhaps a graph of question 13 responses from the group consisting of:
> 802 Officers
> WG officers
> IEEE Staff
> Conference organizers
> Thanks for all of the work on this
> At 10:11 AM 3/6/2003 -0800, you wrote:
> >Attached are the results of the survey that was conducted during the
> >November 2002 Plenary in Kauai.
> >Questions and comments?