Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

[802SEC] Efficient Organization of SEC Business

At 7:34 AM -0400 03/06/23, Paul Nikolich wrote:
>Attached is the initial draft of the July plenary session opening 
>SEC meeting agenda, please review and send requests for revisions to 


I'd like the agenda to include a DT on "Efficient Organization of SEC 

The general issue is that I am very disappointed at the organization 
of the work in front of the SEC. Over the last year or so, I have 
been constantly confused about what is going on and where we stand. 
I've doing a little thinking about why. Maybe I'm just growing old, 
but I've also identified some other causes. I think they need to be 

Here are some specific issues I'd like us to address:

(1) We are currently in the middle of many (don't ask me how many) 
rules change ballots. It is very difficult or impossible to change 
the rules without knowing the rules. How current are the currently 
posted rules? I don't know. On the cover, they say "Revised effective 
July 12, 2002." The PDF Title is "802 Operating Rules, Revised 
effective July 14, 2000." The PDF creation/mod dates are 15/16 
October 2002. In any case, I would presume that no changes from the 
November and March meetings are incorporated. I've just done some 
research. To my knowledge, we approved one change in November ("SEC 
TAG rule change") and two in March ("SEC Electronic Ballots") and 
("Rules Title Change"). There may be even more changes that we made 
to the rules but have not been incorporated in the rules. Where do we 
turn to find the facts?

(1a) As an aside: we changed the balloting rules in March. Are we 
following them?

(1b) As another aside: during my research, I discovered at least one 
rules change ballot that we voted in March to initiate but which, to 
my recollection, has not been initiated ("rules change on Sponsor 
Ballot periods for SEC ballot"). Maybe we've already balloted this 
and I've forgotten. Or maybe there are more that fell through the 
cracks. How should I find out?

(2) There is essentially no web support for the SEC's work. This is 
causing serious problems. We don't need a lot, but we need, at a 
minimum, a catalog of on-going and completed ballots, as Tony and I 
discussed in April:
We need this to help the SEC members do their work, and we need it so 
we have an archive of past decisions.

We also need a catalog of materials for upcoming meetings. I have, 
for example, been cataloging PAR proposals:
but this is not the complete story.

In my Working Group, we wouldn't think of carrying on our activity 
without this kind of web-based organization.

Last summer, when we discussed adding a 2nd Vice Chair, I suggested 
that we follow 802.11's example by assigning specific duties to the 
two. I mentioned, for example, the need to have a particular person 
in charge of the rules, so that things wouldn't fall through the 
cracks. I also said that, with two Vice Chairs, we ought to have 
enough labor to support functions like web site support (I also 
mentioned publicity). I didn't get my way; instead, the rules say "A 
Vice Chair will be responsible for such duties as may be assigned by 
the LMSC Chair." And things are falling through the cracks.

So, can we add this issue to the agenda?