Re: [802SEC] Update on the motion to operate under a pending ruleschange.
I will be starting the P&P ballot this week. I agree with your
ruling and will be happy to reintroduce a motion after
we've done comment resolution on the P&P ballot.
I find the arguments about this roll call vote being a
impediment to progress rather weak given my own experience in
dot17 and the number of times a roll call was requested.
Balancing that against the useful information it gave me as
a chair to help make forward progress, I see very little
likelyhood of this rule being negative.
Paul Nikolich wrote:
> Dear EC members,
> The motion to operate under the pending rules change on Roll Call Votes
> was 7 approve, 5 disapprove, 1 abstain.
> The LMSC bylaws require a least a 2/3 majority of all EC members to
> approve a rules change for submission to ballot and for adoption. The
> EC has 13 members with voting rights. Greater than 2/3 of the EC
> members is at least 9. In my haste to conclude the meeting,
> I didn't apply this rationale, but upon reflection, it is my
> judgement that motions regarding the adoption of a rule (regardless if
> they are permanent or temporary) must require at least 2/3 majority.
> Therefore, the motion to operate under the pending rules change on roll
> call votes did not pass as it did not achieve at least a 2/3 majority.
> --Paul Nikolich
> Chairman, LMSC
Michael Takefman firstname.lastname@example.org
Distinguished Engineer, Cisco Systems
Chair IEEE 802.17 Stds WG
3000 Innovation Dr, Ottawa, Canada, K2K 3E8
voice: 613-254-3399 cell:613-220-6991